Batch1Results:
- Initial mass run of flapping foil code.  Only the Hs=3 case ran properly due to bug in batch file.  Also, the pitch control gains were constant and the resulting pitch behavior varied quite a bit over the range of foil sizes.  The spring/damping behavior for these runs is from the validation tests, or similar.


Batch2Results:
- First successful mass run of flapping foil code.     The pitch control gains are now a function of foil size and reasonably consistent pitch behavior resulted across the range of runs.  The Hs=5 runs didn't converge in all cases which is a problem but not addressed in this batch.  The spring/damping behavior for these runs is from the validation tests, or similar.  Some useful comparison results came out of this.


Batch3Results:
- Submerged Flat Plate of various sizes with linear spring force equal to the plate wet_weight (appropriate to BuoyA2 and BuoyA10) divided by 1m.  A range of linear damping coefficients are examined, b = 0,500,1000,1500,2000,2500 N/(m/s).  There is no drag on the submerged plate (because Cd was inadvertantely left at zero).

Batch4Results:
- Submerged Flat Plate of various sizes with linear spring force equal to the plate wet_weight (appropriate to BuoyA2 and BuoyA10) divided by 1m.  A range of linear damping coefficients are examined, b = 0,1000,2000,3000,4000,5000,6000,7000,8000,9000,10000,11000,120000 N/(m/s).  There is drag on the submerged plate with Cd = 1.2 in the vertical direction of plate motion, and zero in the horizontal direction.

Batch5Results:
- Meaningless, errors in setup.

Batch6Results:
- Submerged Flapping Foil of various sizes with linear spring force equal to the plate wet_weight (appropriate to BuoyA2 and BuoyA10) divided by 1m.  A range of linear damping coefficients are examined, b = 0,1000,2000,3000,4000,5000,6000,7000,8000,9000,10000,11000,120000 N/(m/s).  The Lift/Drag curves for the submerged foil are from the Sandia Report.

Batch7Results:
- Submerged Flat Plate of various sizes with linear spring force equal to the plate wet_weight (appropriate to BuoyA2 and BuoyA10) divided by 1m.  A range of quadratic damping coefficients are examined, c =  0,1000,2000,3000,4000,5000,6000,7000,8000,9000,10000,11000,120000 N/(m/s)^2.  There is drag on the submerged plate with Cd = 1.2 in the vertical direction of plate motion, and zero in the horizontal direction.

Batch8Results:
- Submerged Flapping Foil of various sizes with linear spring force equal to the plate wet_weight (appropriate to BuoyA2 and BuoyA10) divided by 1m.  A range of quadratic damping coefficients are examined, c =  0,1000,2000,3000,4000,5000,6000,7000,8000,9000,10000,11000,120000 N/(m/s)^2.  The Lift/Drag curves for the submerged foil are from the Sandia Report.

Batch9Results:
- Submerged Flat Plate of various sizes with linear spring constant of 2000lbs/m (and plate wet_weight of 2000lbs).  A range of linear damping coefficients are examined, b = 4000,8000,120000 N/(m/s).  There is drag on the submerged plate with Cd = 1.2 in the vertical direction of plate motion, and zero in the horizontal direction.

Jan25ValidationResults:
- Submerged Flat Plate results for system deployed on Jan 25th, 2010.  This system did not have a power generation element but did have a restrictor plate in the oil path that provided about 14000 N/(m/s)^2.  Siginficant stiction existed in the system that needed to be included to get the results measured at sea to match the numerical results.  The runs model the motions driven by the sea state measured on Jan 25th by the wave-rider buoy.


Feb17ValidationResults:
- Submerged Flat Plate results for system deployed on Feb 17th, 2010.  This system did not have a power generation element but did have a restrictor plate in the oil path that provided about 14000 N/(m/s)^2.  Siginficant stiction existed in the system that needed to be included to get the results measured at sea to match the numerical results.  The runs model the motions driven by the sea state measured on Feb 17th by the wave-rider buoy.