HR: 1330h
AN: A32B-0145 [PDF]
TI: Evaluation of a Three-Dimensional Global Model in Simulating Upper-Tropospheric Chemistry
AU: * Meijer, E W
EM: meijere@knmi.nl
AF: Royal Netherlands Meteorological
Institute, P.O. BOX 201, De Bilt, 3730 AE
Netherlands
AU: van Weele, M
EM: weelevm@knmi.nl
AF: Royal Netherlands Meteorological
Institute, P.O. BOX 201, De Bilt, 3730 AE
Netherlands
AU: Bregman, B
EM: bregman@knmi.nl
AF: Royal Netherlands Meteorological
Institute, P.O. BOX 201, De Bilt, 3730 AE
Netherlands
AU: Segers, A
EM: segers@knmi.nl
AF: Royal Netherlands Meteorological
Institute, P.O. BOX 201, De Bilt, 3730 AE
Netherlands
AU: Olivie, D
EM: olivie@knmi.nl
AF: Royal Netherlands Meteorological
Institute, P.O. BOX 201, De Bilt, 3730 AE
Netherlands
AU: van Noije, T
EM: noije@knmi.nl
AF: Royal Netherlands Meteorological
Institute, P.O. BOX 201, De Bilt, 3730 AE
Netherlands
AU: van Velthoven, P
EM: velthove@knmi.nl
AF: Royal Netherlands Meteorological
Institute, P.O. BOX 201, De Bilt, 3730 AE
Netherlands
AB:
The impact of anthropogenic activity on radiatively active trace species in the tropopause region (Upper Troposphere and
Lower stratosphere or UTLS) is still poorly known. The climate sensitivity, however, is particularly high in this region.
Many modeling studies address the anthropogenic ozone and methane perturbations in the UTLS, but it is virtually
unknown to what extent global chemistry-transport models (CTMs) are capable of adequately simulating such perturbations.
Modeling the chemical composition of the UTLS is very difficult, since this region is characterized by strong
cross-tropopause concentration gradients, mixing between the stratosphere and the troposphere, and by deep convection.
In order to evaluate the performance of our CTM (TM3) in quantifying the effects of anthropogenic activity on UTLS ozone and
methane concentrations, we evaluated the model results with the observations of the SONEX campaign, conducted in October and
November 1997 in the UTLS over parts of the U.S, Europe and the northern Atlantic Ocean. We compared simulated concentrations
of trace gases and radicals, as well as OH and HO$_2$ loss and production rates, with the observed values. In particular we
discuss the role of non-methane hydrocarbons, the influence of convection, and ECMWF water vapor biases. We also discuss the
application of the new ECMWF reanalysis data (ERA40).
Despite several problems the model reproduced the observed rates reasonably well. On average the modeled ozone production was
within 30% of the observed value. For samples not exposed to recent convection and/or lightning the modeled ozone
production was within 20% of the observed.
DE: 0300 ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE
DE: 0317 Chemical kinetic and photochemical properties
DE: 0322 Constituent sources and sinks
DE: 0365 Troposphere--composition and chemistry
DE: 0368 Troposphere--constituent transport and chemistry
SC: Atmospheric Sciences [A]
MN: 2003 Fall Meeting