HR: 0830h
AN: B11C-0711 [PDF]
TI: Estimating Paleoflood Magnitude From Tree-Ring Anatomy and the Height of Abrasion Scars
AU: * Yanosky, T M
EM: tyanosky@usgs.gov
AF: US Geological Survey, Mail Stopo 430, Reston, VA 20192 United States
AU: Jarrett, R D
EM: rjarrett@usgs.gov
AF: US Geological Survey, P.O. Box 25046, Mail Stop 412, Lakewood, CO 80225 United States
AB:
Evidence of floods preserved in the growth rings of trees can be used to extend the historical record of flooding or to
estimate the magnitude of extraordinary floods on ungaged streams. Floods that damage the aerial parts of trees during the
growing season sometimes induce striking anatomical changes in subsequent growth of rings in the lower trunk. In ring-porous
species, this growth most commonly produces concentric bands of atypically large vessels within the latewood. The number
and diameter of anomalous vessels seem positively related to the amount of flood damage, and thus can be used to refine
estimates of flood magnitude when also considering the position of the tree relative to the channel and its approximate
height during the flood. Floods of long duration on low-gradient streams are less likely to damage trees directly, but
prolonged root flooding often results in the formation of narrow rings with atypically small vessels; shorter-duration
floods, sometimes inundating roots for as little as several days, are followed by the production of fibers (non-conducting
cells) with large lumens and thin walls that appear as light-colored bands compared to earlier-formed tissue. In these
instances, a series of trees increasingly distant from the channel can be used to estimate a minimum flood elevation.
Abrasion scars from flood-borne debris often are the most easily observed evidence of flood damage and, like anatomical
abnormalities, can be precisely dated. The relation between the heights of scars and maximum flood stages depends in part
upon channel slope. Previous studies have indicated that scar heights along low-gradient streams are the same or slightly
lower than maximum flood elevations. Along the high-gradient (6% maximum slope) Buffalo Creek, Colorado USA, scar heights
measured in 102 trees following a flood in 1996 ranged from -0.6 to +1.5 m relative to the actual crest elevation. Scar
elevations exceeding flood elevations by 3-4 m, however, were observed following a flood in 2002 along a small Colorado
stream with slopes ranging from 6 to 15%.
DE: 1821 Floods
DE: 1860 Runoff and streamflow
DE: 4221 Dendrochronology
SC: Biogeosciences [B]
MN: 2003 Fall Meeting