HR: 09:30h
AN: H21B-06 [PDF]
TI: On the Importance of Linear vs Non-Linear Response in Estimating Base Flow Features for Ungauged
Catchments in Southern Texas
AU: * Anderson, R
EM: richard.anderson@noaa.gov
AF: Hydrology Laboratory
National Weather Service
NOAA, 1325 East West Highway, Silver Spring, Md 20910 United States
AU: Koren, V
EM: victor.koren@noaa.gov
AF: Hydrology Laboratory
National Weather Service
NOAA, 1325 East West Highway, Silver Spring, Md 20910 United States
AU: Smith, M
EM: michael.smith@noaa.gov
AF: Hydrology Laboratory
National Weather Service
NOAA, 1325 East West Highway, Silver Spring, Md 20910 United States
AU: Seo, D
EM: dongjun.seo@noaa.gov
AF: Hydrology Laboratory
National Weather Service
NOAA, 1325 East West Highway, Silver Spring, Md 20910 United States
AB:
Various equations have been derived and applied in the study of groundwater base flows. Many studies have confirmed the
applicability of a linear storage-discharge relationship in describing groundwater outflows into stream channels from
adjoining aquifers. This result has been used in studies of base flow to estimate various catchment-scale, effective
hydraulic parameters such as saturated hydraulic conductivity, drainable porosity, and base flow recession constant.
However, other studies have found that a nonlinear formulation of catchment response is more appropriate, and an explanation
of this difference from a physical basis remains an unsolved problem.
In a study of six catchments in southern Ohio, eastern Kentucky, and southern West Virginia (within the Ohio River Forecast
Center of the National Weather Service), preliminary results showed that two catchments exhibited nonlinear recession
behavior, while the others behaved in a linear fashion. As judged by flow statistics and hydrograph comparison, Sacramento
model performance based on a method for a priori parameter estimation was better for the two non-linear catchments than for
the linear catchments. In particular, base flow recession parameters were significantly better for the non-linear
catchments. Better physical understanding of this difference could lead to improved a priori estimation of base flow
parameters. However, the potential to do so is increased (1) by examining a different geographical region and (2) analyzing
a larger sample of catchments.
In this paper, a set of 23 catchments in southern Texas is examined in order to further explore the occurrence and
significance of linear vs. nonlinear catchment hydraulic behavior. We discuss implications for improving Sacramento a priori
parameter estimates as well as regionalization of
its parameters.
DE: 1829 Groundwater hydrology
DE: 1860 Runoff and streamflow
DE: 1866 Soil moisture
SC: Hydrology [H]
MN: 2003 Fall Meeting