HR: 16:00h
AN: H32I-01    [PDF]
TI: Bedload Rating and Flow Competence Curves Vary With Watershed and Bed Material Parameters
AU: * Bunte, K
EM: kbunte@engr.colostate.edu
AF: Engineering Research Center, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 United States
AU: Abt, S R
EM: sabt@engr.colostate.edu
AF: Engineering Research Center, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 United States
AB: Bedload transport rating curves and flow competence curves (largest bedload size for specified flow) are usually not known for streams unless a large number of bedload samples has been collected and analyzed. However, this information is necessary for assessing instream flow needs and stream responses to watershed effects. This study therefore analyzed whether bedload transport rating and flow competence curves were related to stream parameters. Bedload transport rating curves and flow competence curves were obtained from extensive bedload sampling in six gravel- and cobble-bed mountain streams. Samples were collected using bedload traps and a large net sampler, both of which provide steep and relatively well-defined bedload rating and flow competence curves due to a long sampling duration, a large sampler opening and a large sampler capacity. The sampled streams have snowmelt regimes, steep (1-9%) gradients, and watersheds that are mainly forested and relatively undisturbed with basin area sizes of 8 to 105 km$^{2}$. The channels are slightly incised and can contain flows of more than 1.5 times bankfull with little overbank flow. Exponents of bedload rating and flow competence curves obtained from these measurements were found to systematically increase with basin area size and decrease with the degree of channel armoring. By contrast, coefficients of bedload rating and flow competence curves decreased with basin size and increased with armoring. All of these relationships were well-defined (0.86 $<$ r$^{2}$ $<$ 0.99). Data sets from other studies in coarse-bedded streams fit the indicated trend if the sampling device used allows measuring bedload transport rates over a wide range and if bedload supply is somewhat low. The existence of a general positive trend between bedload rating curve exponents and basin area, and a negative trend between coefficients and basin area, is confirmed by a large data set of bedload rating curves obtained from Helley-Smith samples. However, in this case, the trends only become visible as basin area sizes span a wide range (1 - 10,000 km$^{2}$). The well-defined relationships obtained from the bedload trap and the large net sampler suggest that exponents and coefficients of bedload transport rating curves (and flow competence curves) are predictable from an easily obtainable parameter such as basin size. However, the relationships of bedload rating curve exponents and coefficients with basin size and armoring appear to be influenced by the sampling device used and the watershed sediment production.
DE: 1815 Erosion and sedimentation
DE: 1824 Geomorphology (1625)
DE: 1860 Runoff and streamflow
SC: Hydrology [H]
MN: 2003 Fall Meeting