HR: 0830h
AN: P41B-0406 [PDF]
TI: Assessing Geologic Image Interpretation Errors Occurring in Extraterrestrial Robotic
Exploration
AU: Wagner, J
EM: jlwagner@engineering.uiowa.edu
AF: University of Iowa, 2404 Seamans Center, Iowa City, IA 52242
AU: * Anderson, R C
EM: robert.c.anderson@jpl.nasa.gov
AF: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91109
AU: Thomas, G
EM: Geb-Thomas@uiowa.edu
AF: University of Iowa, 2404 Seamans Center, Iowa City, IA 52242
AU: Cabrol, N
EM: ncabrol@mail.arc.nasa.gov
AF: NASA Ames Research Center, Space Science Division, Moffett Field, CA 94035
AU: Grin, E
EM: egrin@mail.arc.nasa.gov
AF: NASA Ames Research Center, Space Science Division, Moffett Field, CA 94035
AU: Glasgow, J
EM: jmglasgo@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu
AF: University of Iowa, 2404 Seamans Center, Iowa City, IA 52242
AB:
Robotic exploration of the Martian surface requires numerous interpretations of imaged data, where incorrect results can have
drastic consequences. The imaging process transforms and reduces the amount of information available. Three experiments
measured the differences in interpretation between imaged sediments and physical sediments. Three characteristics were
analyzed: grain length, grain shape, and grain distribution. The results found the difference between the grain length
measured on an image and the true length to $\pm$ 2.333 pixels (p $<$0.0001); the difference is similar to the amount of
blurring introduced by the camera. Both grain roundness and grain sphericity were classified on a scale from 1 to 6 in the
shape experiment. The roundness classification differed by 0.114 categories (p = 0.0082) with the imaged grains being
rounder. The sphericity classification differed by 0.151 categories (p = 0.0010) with the imaged grains being less spherical.
In the distribution experiment, the subjects determined the percentage of the total image area covered by grains in six
specified size ranges. The average error for each size range was 11.112 % of the total area (p $<$ 0.0001). In all three
experiments, the measurements taken using the imaged specimens significantly differed from the measurements taken using the
physical specimens. The magnitudes of the differences were small and may not be scientifically significant.
DE: 5464 Remote sensing
SC: Planetary Sciences [P]
MN: 2003 Fall Meeting