HR: 0830h
AN: S11C-0307 INVITED [PDF]
TI: Seismic anisotropy within the Tibetan crust
AU: * Shapiro, N
EM: nshapiro@fignon.colorado.edu
AF: Department of Physics, University of Colorado at Boulder, Campus Box 390, Boulder, CO 80309-0390 United States
AU: Levin, V
EM: vadim@ldeo.columbia.edu
AF: Department of Geological Sciences,Rutgers University, Wright Geological Laboratory, 610 Taylor Road,
Piscataway, NJ 08854-8066 United States
AU: Ritzwoller, M
EM: ritzwoll@merckx.colorado.edu
AF: Department of Physics, University of Colorado at Boulder, Campus Box 390, Boulder, CO 80309-0390 United States
AU: Molnar, P
EM: molnar@cires.colorado.edu
AF: Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado at Boulder, Benson Earth Sciences Building,
Campus Box 399, Room 462C, Boulder, CO 80309 United States
AU: Smith, D
EM: dansmith@ciei.colorado.edu
AF: Department of Physics, University of Colorado at Boulder, Campus Box 390, Boulder, CO 80309-0390 United States
AB:
Three lines of evidence argue for the existence of strong
anisotropy within the Tibetan crust. First,
Rayleigh waves demonstrate very strong reverse dispersion
between periods of 20 and 35 sec, while Love wave dispersion
is normal. This discrepancy is explained by radial
anisotropy in the middle to lower crust beneath most of Tibet.
Second, we map azimuthal anisotropy
using surface-wave tomography. The short period maps (e.g., 20 sec), which
are particularly sensitive to the upper to middle crust, display predominantly
north-south 2$\psi$ fast axes across Tibet whereas these
patterns rotate to being predominantly northwest-southeast at longer periods,
which are characteristic of the deep crust and/or uppermost mantle.
Third, teleseismic body-wave
reverberations display strong signals on the transverse-component
on Tibetan stations, consistent with the presence of an
anisotropic layer (or layers) in the crust.
The interpretation of the crustal anisotropy in terms of the
models of finite strain is more uncertain than interpreting
mantle anisotropy which is mostly produced by the preferred
orientation of olivine. Several
physical mechanisms relate crustal anisotropy to finite strain.
Preferential orientation of faults may be the dominant mechanism
in the Tibetan upper crust, whereas in the middle to lower crust
beneath Tibet anisotropy
may result from preferred mineralogical orientation.
Mica, in particular, may play the most significant role in middle
to lower crustal anisotropy, with larger shear moduli parallel
to the plane of oriented mica crystals than perpendicular to it.
These preliminary results on the vertical distribution of radial and
azimuthal anisotropy are consistent with a model in which Tibet
extends east-west with vertical flattening. This extension would
be accommodated in the upper crust by normal faulting with a
preferential north-south orientation, which would explain the
azimuthal anisotropy observed with short-period Rayleigh waves.
In the middle crust, large-scale extension would produce both
crustal thinning and viscous east-west flow that would result
in a combination of radial and azimuthal anisotropy in which the
latter may be oriented differently from that in the upper crust.
DE: 5100 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF ROCKS
DE: 7203 Body wave propagation
DE: 7205 Continental crust (1242)
DE: 7255 Surface waves and free oscillations
DE: 8109 Continental tectonics--extensional (0905)
SC: Seismology [S]
MN: 2003 Fall Meeting