HR: 11:50h
AN: SM51E-07 [PDF]
TI: Why do Some Storms Decrease the Flux of Relativisitic Electrons in the Radiation Belts ?
AU: * Summers, D
EM: dsummers@math.mun.ca
AF: Memorial Univ. of Newfoundland, Dept. of Math. and Stats, St. John's, NF A1C 5S7
Canada
AU: Ma, C
AF: Univ. of Calgary, Dept. of Computer Sci., Calgary, AB T2N 1N4
Canada
AU: Mukai, T
AF: ISAS, 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Sagamihara, 229-8510
Japan
AB:
An analysis by Reeves et al.(2003) of 276 geomagnetic
storms during the period 1989 to 2000 indicates that while
about one half of the storms resulted in an increase in
the relativistic electron flux in the radiation belts, about
one quarter actually decreased the fluxes. In this paper,
we demonstrate quantitatively that whether or not storms
produce an increase or decrease of relativistic electrons
in the inner magnetosphere depends on the competition
between the physical processes producing the energization
and loss of electrons. We construct a model for the
electron energy distribution function incorporating electron
energization by cyclotron resonant interaction with
whistler-mode chorus, and electron losses due to
pitch-angle scattering into the loss cone by combined
plasma waves (in particular EMIC waves and plasmaspheric
hiss). We then carry out numerical experiments,
treating the chorus wave amplitude and electron loss
rate as model input variables, and computing the
solution for the electron energy distribution function
(at a specified time after the storm) as the model output.
We find that the extent of the electron
flux increase or decrease over the course of the storm
is controlled by the magnitudes of the wave amplitude
and the particle loss rate. For instance, the results show
that if the timescale for particle loss is several days,
then a wave amplitude of 10 pT is sufficient to
generate a relativistic electron flux increase, while
even wave amplitudes as high as 100 pT, if
accompanied by a particle loss rate near to that
corresponding to strong diffusion, would result in a
flux decrease. This study re-enforces the assertion that
in order to model the
relativistic electron flux variations in the radiation belts over the course of
any given geomagnetic storm, a proper accounting
must be made of particle losses.
DE: 2716 Energetic particles, precipitating
DE: 2720 Energetic particles, trapped
DE: 2730 Magnetosphere--inner
DE: 2788 Storms and substorms
SC: SPA - Magnetospheric Physics [SM]
MN: 2003 Fall Meeting