HR: 13:55h
AN: T22C-02 INVITED     [PDF]
TI: A reality check on the timing of initiation, geological offsets, slip rates and geodetic rates on the Karakoram strike-slip fault.
AU: * Searle, M P
EM: mikes@earth.ox.ac.uk
AF: dept. Earth Sciences Oxford University, Parks Rd, Oxford, OX1 3PR
AU: Phillips, R J
EM: richardp@earth.ox.ac.uk
AF: dept. Earth Sciences Oxford University, Parks Rd, Oxford, OX1 3PR
AB: Total geological offset of 1000 km along the dextral Karakoram fault (Peltzer \& Tapponnier 1989) were based on incorrect correlation of granite belts from the Pamir to S. Tibet and active slip rates of 30mm/yr-1 were based on an assumption of the age of offset post-glacial features (10 $\pm$ 2 ka; Liu et al. 1992). Detailed mapping and U-Pb and 40Ar/39Ar geochronology has confirmed that total dextral offsets are less than 120 km, the timing of initiation of the fault must have been younger than 15 Ma and that exhumation of sheared leucogranites and migmatites occurred between 15-11 Ma (Searle et al., 1997; Dunlap et al., 1998). We stress that: 1. All Tibetan fault slip rates published prior to 1996 are invalid as no precise timing constraints on the post-glacial Quaternary features were used. The common assumption was that all glacial features were formed 10 $\pm$ 2 ka, without any absolute dating. The glacial and fluvial features used to constrain offsets could have been awry by a factor of 3 or 4 (from 3.5 Ma - 20,000 ka). 2. Recent slip rates derived from cosmogenic isotope dating of offset Quaternary features should be treated with immense caution because during the continual recycling process of glacial moraine or alluvial fan burial, exposure and re-deposition, it cannot be known precisely which phase of exhumation is being dated. 3. Long-term geological slip rates on offset granites, precisely constrained by U-Pb geochronology remain the best estimates of timing of initiation, total finite offset and slip rates on Tibetan strike-slip faults. 4. The Karakoram fault is unlikely to be a lithospheric scale fault, because (a) temperatures beneath the southern part of the Tibetan plateau and beneath the faults are high enough to induce melting ($>$700$\deg$C at only 20 km depth), and (b) the lower crust beneath these faults must be underplated cold, old granulite facies crust of the Indian shield. 5. There appears to be a distinct lack of seismicity located along the Karakoram fault today. GPS data suggest that right-lateral slip parallel to the Karakoram fault occurred at 3.4 $\pm$ 5 mm/yr (Gaur 2002). If this figure is meaningful, then the slip today must be taken up mainly by aseismic creep, which suggests high temperatures occur at shallow depths along the fault, consistent with continuous but sporadic, and very young high-temperature metamorphism and anatexis in the southern Karakoram (Fraser et al. 2001). References cited: Dunlap, W.J., Weinberg, R.F. \& Searle, M.P. 1998. J. Geol. Soc. London, 155, 903-12. Fraser, J.E., Searle, M.P., Parrish, R.R. \& Noble, S.R. 2001. Bull. Geol. Soc. America, 113, 1443-55. Gaur, V. 2002. Abstract, 17th Himalaya-Karakoram-Tibet Workshop, Sikkim. Peltzer, G., Tapponnier, P. 1988. J. Geophysical Research, 93, 15058-117. Searle, M.P., Weinberg, R.F. \& Dunlap, W.J. 1998. In: Continental Transpressional and Transtensional Tectonics. Geol. Soc. London Spec. Pub. 135, 307-26.
DE: 8110 Continental tectonics--general (0905)
DE: 8155 Plate motions--general
SC: Tectonophysics [T]
MN: 2003 Fall Meeting