HR: 0830h
AN: T31F-0897 [PDF]
TI: Mid-Cretaceous Exhumation of the Early Cretaceous Kamuikotan Blueschists in Hokkaido, Japan
AU: * Ueda, H
EM: ueta@mvf.biglobe.ne.jp
AF: Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Niigata University, Ikarashi ni-no-cho 8050, Niigata,
950-2181
Japan
AU: Kawamura, M
EM: mkawa@strati.sci.hokudai.ac.jp
AF: Division of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Hokkaido University, North 10
West 8, Sapporo, 060-0810
Japan
AB:
Unconformity and fluvial deposits containing blueschist clasts in a Cretaceous forearc basin sequence indicate that a part of
the Kamuikotan high-P/T metabasites (Iwashimizu Complex: Valanginian-Barremian) was exhumed in the mid-Cretaceous
(Aptian-Albian).
The Iwashimizu Complex consists mainly of metabasites originated from subducted seamounts, accompanied by subordinate chert
and turbidites. The complex is a pile of nappe units, each of which comprises a duplex of metabasite slices. Metamorphic
grade decreases structurally downward from the blueschist facies to the lawsonite-albite facies. Metabasite clasts in the
forearc basin were derived limitedly from the epidote-bearing upper unit, and they never contain lawsonite, the
characteristic mineral in the lower unit. White-mica K-Ar ages of the structurally lowest units (Watanabe et al., 1994) are
coeval to the unconformity event, suggesting that the exhumation of the upper unit and metamorphism of the lower unit
contemporarily occurred. The most reasonable explanation may be that the structurally upper blueschist unit was rapidly
jacked-up by subsequent underplating accretion of structurally lower unit during the seamounts subduction. Decrease of
metamorphic grade structurally downward can be explained by the decrease of subducted slab dip, as suggested by younging of
subducted oceanic crust based on fossil ages of oceanic sediments.
The Iwashimizu Complex was originally overlain by the Jurassic Lower Sorachi Ophiolite, based on tectonostratigraphic
comparison with the area where the blueschists were not exhumed in the mid-Cretaceous. The absence of detritus of the
ophiolite origin suggests that the ophiolite must have been removed tectonically, not by sedimentary erosion, during the
exhumation. The contrasting tectonism, i.e. structural thickening (duplex) and unroofing (presumable extension), can
contemporarily occur during repetitive seamounts subduction, because of the forearc thickening in front of subducting
seamounts, coupled with extensional failure in rear of them.
DE: 8105 Continental margins and sedimentary basins
SC: Tectonophysics [T]
MN: 2003 Fall Meeting