HR: 0830h
AN: T41C-0228    [PDF]
TI: The Cooling Oceanic Lithosphere as Constrained by Surface Wave Dispersion Data
AU: Hogg, C
EM: chogg@igpp.ucsd.edu
AF: University College, Belfield, Dublin, 4 Ireland
AU: * Laske, G
EM: glaske@ucsd.edu
AF: IGPP-0225, UCSD, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093-0225 United States
AB: The tremendous improvement in resolution capabilities of global surface wave phase velocity maps now encourage us to search for anomalies that are caused by mantle plumes. On the other hand, the implications of even large--scale anomalies in such maps are still not well understood. One such anomaly is caused by the cooling oceanic lithosphere. Some studies investigate the cooling effects by fitting thermal models to the 3--dimensional mantle models resulting from tomographic inversions. The inversion of surface wave data for structure at depth is nonunique and the model often depends on the techniques applied. We prefer to compare the dispersion data directly with predictions from thermal models. Simple cooling models produce a signal that is roughly proportional to the square root of age. This signal is typically much smaller than the one caused by other lateral heterogeneity within the Earth's crust and upper mantle. In a careful analysis we are able to extract clear, roughly linear trends, in all major oceans. We explore the parameter space by fitting cooling half space as well as cooling plate models to the data. In the Pacific ocean, our data are inconsistent with standard parameters that are used to fit the observed bathymetry, and perhaps surface heat flux data. Instead of an initial temperature of 1350~deg C in the cooling half space model our data require a lower temperature (around 1200~deg C) to be well fit, especially the Love wave data. Regarding the cooling plate model, our data seem to require a thicker lithosphere to be well fit (135~km instead of the 'standard' 100 ~m). We observe similar trends for the other oceans investigated: the Indian ocean, the South and the North Atlantic oceans. For the Indian ocean in particular, a crust correction (removing the predictions caused by crustal structure including water depth and sediment thickness) is crucial to obtain an internally consistent dataset. For the Atlantic ocean, a large signal remains unexplained. An age--dependent signal is also apparent in the SS-S and PP-P body wave datasets. However, a comprehensive analysis is somewhat hampered for two reasons: 1) the uneven sampling of the data does not allow us to analyze trends in some oceans (e.g. South Atlantic Ocean); 2) the signal in the oldest parts of the oceans appear ''too fast''. We suspect that we observe effects that are deeper--rooted than the lithosphere--asthenosphere system (e.g. subducting slabs). The surface wave dispersion maps contain an intriguing oscillating signal that is particularly strong for Rayleigh waves in the Pacific ocean. This signal is symmetric to the EPR and we speculate that this is caused by current convective processes or by processes at the time when the plates were formed.
UR: http://mahi.ucsd.edu/Gabi
DE: 3040 Plate tectonics (8150, 8155, 8157, 8158)
DE: 7255 Surface waves and free oscillations
DE: 8120 Dynamics of lithosphere and mantle--general
DE: 8180 Tomography
SC: Tectonophysics [T]
MN: 2003 Fall Meeting