HR: 13:55h
AN: A13E-02 [Abstracts]
TI: A closure study of aerosol-CCN measurements from recent field campaigns.
AU: * Cubison, M J
EM: michael.cubison@colorado.edu
AF: CIRES, University of Colorado, CIRES Building Room 318
UCB 216, Boulder, CO 80309
United States
AU: Ervens, B
EM: Barbara.Ervens@noaa.gov
AF: Colorado State University and NOAA ETL, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305
United States
AU: Andrews, B
EM: betsy.andrews@noaa.gov
AF: NOAA CMDL, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305
United States
AU: DeCarlo, P
EM: peter.decarlo@colorado.edu
AF: CIRES, University of Colorado, CIRES Building Room 318
UCB 216, Boulder, CO 80309
United States
AU: Jobson, T
EM: Tom.Jobson@pnl.gov
AF: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, PO Box 999, Richland, WA 99352
United States
AU: Laskin, A
EM: alexander.laskin@pnl.gov
AF: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, PO Box 999, Richland, WA 99352
United States
AU: Feingold, G
EM: graham.feingold@noaa.gov
AF: NOAA ETL, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305
United States
AU: Jimenez, J L
EM: jose.jimenez@colorado.edu
AF: Dept of Chemistry and CIRES, University of Colorado, CIRES Building Room 318
UCB 216, Boulder, CO 80309
United States
AU: Ogren, J A
EM: john.a.ogren@noaa.gov
AF: NOAA CMDL, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305
United States
AB:
Aerosols and clouds play an important role in the radiative budget of
the atmosphere, through both direct scattering effects and indirectly
through perturbations arising from the activation of aerosol to cloud
condensation nuclei (CCN). Current understanding of these processes is
low (IPCC, 2001), and further understanding of the physical and chemical
parameters influencing CCN activation is required to predict these
effects in global climate models.
We present an investigation into the activation of aerosol to CCN using results from field campaigns in both
marine and urban environments. A model simulating the uptake of water
vapour to aerosol particles was employed to achieve closure between
aerosol composition, size distribution and scattering behaviour, by
adjusting the model aerosol composition until calculated physical
aerosol parameters match those in the measurements. Results are presented
from this model using data from the 2004 ICARTT campaign at
Chebogue Point, Nova Scotia. It was shown that closure was quite
successful at high supersaturations (> 0.3%), but remained difficult to
achieve at the lower supersaturation values. We present findings examining the limitations
of the data set and show how the closure was limited through errors in the CCN
measurements, low signal to noise in the composition measurements from
the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS), and lack of information
about the Aitken or coarse modes.
Improvements to the model and data measurement and analysis techniques arising from the Chebogue Point closure study are
discussed, and first results are presented using new data taken in summer 2005 from the marine MACE study at Point Reyes, CA,
and the urban pollution SOAR campaign in Riverside, CA. We conclude by using the water uptake model to look at the physical
and chemical properties influencing CCN activation in the different environments studied.
DE: 0305 Aerosols and particles (0345, 4801, 4906)
DE: 0321 Cloud/radiation interaction
DE: 3311 Clouds and aerosols
SC: Atmospheric Sciences [A]
MN: Fall Meeting 2005