HR: 0800h
AN: P51A-0912 [Abstracts]
TI: Determination of the Trajectory of a Fireball Using Seismic Data
AU: * Pujol, J
EM: jpujol@memphis.edu
AF: Dept. of Earth Sciences, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, Memphis, TN 38152
United States
AU: Rydelek, P
EM: par@ceri.memphis.edu
AF: Center for Earthquake Research and Information, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, Memphis,
TN 38152
United States
AU: Ishihara, Y
EM: ishihara@aob.geophys.tohoku.ac.jp
AF: Research Center for Prediction of Earthquakes and Volcanic Eruptions, Tohoku University, Aoba-ku,
Sendai, 980-8578
Japan
AB:
We developed two methods to determine the trajectory of a
fireball using the arrival times of the shock waves recorded by a seismic network.
One method is analytical and the other is graphical. The analytical method
is based on the assumption that the trajectory is straight and that the fireball
velocity and speed of sound are constant. The unknown parameters are
the azimuth and inclination angle of the trajectory, the coordinates of the
intersection of the trajectory with the earth's surface, and the intersection
time (t_0). As the problem is non-linear in all but one of the parameters
(t_0), it is linearized by means of a Taylor expansion about a set of initial
estimates and solved iteratively using damped least squares. This method
was applied to fireballs recorded in the U.S.A. (Arkansas), Japan (Miyako
and Kanto) and the Czech Republic (Morávka). Testing of the method with actual
and synthetic data shows that the fireball velocity cannot be determined uniquely,
and trades off with t_0. The parameters of the Morávka fireball were determined
by others using video recordings and are highly reliable; comparison with our results
show that the errors in the determination of the azimuth and inclination angle
are 1.7° and 1.3°, respectively, which are not too large given the
unfavorable distribution of stations. The Arkansas fireball was recorded by
three-component seismometers and the observed and predicted horizontal polarizations
are in good agreement. The graphical method is based on the drawing of contours
of arrival times. Ideally, the contours should be elliptical for fireball shock waves
but this constraint is not used when contouring the data. If the distribution
of seismic stations is appropriate, the azimuth of the trajectory is obtained
from the axis of symmetry of the contours, while the inclination angle is
estimated from the contour spacing. Application of the methods to the four
fireballs shows that the graphically derived parameters can be within a few
degrees of the analytical parameters. For the Arkansas fireball the agreement
between the analytical and graphical contours is excellent, and because there is
no assumption behind the drawing of the graphical contours, this agreement
provides additional evidence in support of the analytical method.
DE: 6099 General or miscellaneous
DE: 6299 General or miscellaneous
SC: Planetary Sciences [P]
MN: Fall Meeting 2005