HR: 0800h
AN: PP31B-1534 [Abstracts]
TI: Factors Influencing the Stable Oxygen and Hydrogen Isotopic Composition (δ 18O and δ
D) of a Subarctic Freshwater Lake Ecosystem
AU: * Wang, Y
EM: ftyw@uaf.edu
AF: Dept. of Geology and Geophyics, University of Alaska Fairbanks, University of Alaska Fairbanks Duckering
454, Fairbanks, AK 99775
United States
AU: * Wang, Y
EM: ftyw@uaf.edu
AF: Alaska Stable Isotope Facility, University of Alaska Fairbanks, University of Alaska Fairbanks Duckering
437, Fairbanks, AK 99775
United States
AU: Wooller, M J
EM: ffmjw@uaf.edu
AF: Dept. of Geology and Geophyics, University of Alaska Fairbanks, University of Alaska Fairbanks Duckering
454, Fairbanks, AK 99775
United States
AU: Wooller, M J
EM: ffmjw@uaf.edu
AF: Alaska Stable Isotope Facility, University of Alaska Fairbanks, University of Alaska Fairbanks Duckering
437, Fairbanks, AK 99775
United States
AU: Wooller, M J
EM: ffmjw@uaf.edu
AF: School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, School of fisheries and ocean
sciences, Fairbanks, AK 99775
United States
AB:
Previous studies have shown that the stable oxygen and hydrogen isotopic compositions (δ 18O and δD) in
various animal tissues can be used to examine past climates and animal migration pattern. Little attention has been paid to
the relative roles of diet and water influencing the overall δ 18O and δD of animal tissues in freshwater
ecosystems. It is unclear whether different trophic levels in a freshwater lake ecosystem have an identical relationship to
the water that surrounds them. The δ18O and δD values of animal tissues may be controlled by numerous
different factors, including metabolic and biosynthetic isotopic fractionation and variations of δ 18O and
δD in the food available. We began to examine these issues by analyzing the δ 18O and δD throughout
a freshwater aquatic ecosystem at Smith Lake in Alaska. We collected samples representing primary producers and consumers
(primary and secondary). Samples included green algae, various aquatic plants, such as Nuphar variegatum (water lily),
Polygonum amphibium (water smartweed), Carex utriculata (sedge), Utricularia vulgaris (common bladderwort),
Typha latifolia (common cattail), and a range of aquatic invertebrates, including Chironomus. sp (midge),
Zygoptera (damselfly), Anisoptera (dragonfly), Dytiscidae (diving beetle) and Euhirudinea (leeches). The δ 18O
and δD of Smith Lake water were ~-13.5e and -129.0e, respectively, and we present the δ 18O and
δD of the rest of the ecosystem relative to these data. For instance, the δ 18O of chironomus sp. was
~12.1‰, which is greater than the of the lake water. Preliminary results suggest the extent of the fractionation between
δ 18O of chironomids vs. lake water δ 18O is consistent with previous studies. Our data provide an
insight into the range of variations that could be expected within a single freshwater ecosystem.
DE: 4942 Limnology (0458, 1845, 4239)
DE: 4950 Paleoecology
SC: Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology [PP]
MN: Fall Meeting 2005