HR: 0800h
AN: S11A-0161 [Abstracts]
TI: DSOD Procedures for Seismic Hazard Analysis
AU: * Howard, J K
EM: jhoward@water.ca.gov
AF: California Division of Safety of Dams, 2200 X St, Suite 200, Sacramento, CA 95818
United States
AU: Fraser, W A
EM: billf@water.ca.gov
AF: California Division of Safety of Dams, 2200 X St, Suite 200, Sacramento, CA 95818
United States
AB:
DSOD, which has jurisdiction over more than 1200 dams in California, routinely evaluates their dynamic stability using
seismic shaking input ranging from simple pseudostatic coefficients to spectrally matched earthquake time histories. Our
seismic hazard assessments assume maximum earthquake scenarios of nearest active and conditionally active seismic sources.
Multiple earthquake scenarios may be evaluated depending on sensitivity of the design analysis (e.g., to certain spectral
amplitudes, duration of shaking). Active sources are defined as those with evidence of movement within the last 35,000
years. Conditionally active sources are those with reasonable expectation of activity, which are treated as active until
demonstrated otherwise.
The Division's Geology Branch develops seismic hazard estimates using spectral attenuation formulas applicable to California.
The formulas were selected, in part, to achieve a site response model similar to the 2000 IBC's for rock, soft rock, and
stiff soil sites. The level of dynamic loading used in the stability analysis (50th, 67th, or 84th percentile ground
shaking estimates) is determined using a matrix that considers consequence of dam failure and fault slip rate. We account
for near-source directivity amplification along such faults by adjusting target response spectra and developing appropriate
design earthquakes for analysis of structures sensitive to long-period motion. Based on in-house studies, the orientation of
the dam analysis section relative to the fault-normal direction is considered for strike-slip earthquakes, but directivity
amplification is assumed in any orientation for dip-slip earthquakes. We do not have probabilistic standards, but we
evaluate the probability of our ground shaking estimates using hazard curves constructed from the USGS Interactive
De-Aggregation website. Typically, return periods for our design loads exceed 1000 years. Excessive return periods may
warrant a lower design load. Minimum shaking levels are provided for sites far from active faulting.
Our procedures and standards are presented at the DSOD website http://damsafety.water.ca.gov/. We review our methods and
tools periodically under the guidance of our Consulting Board for Earthquake Analysis (and expect to make changes pending NGA
completion), mindful that frequent procedural changes can interrupt design evaluations.
DE: 7212 Earthquake ground motions and engineering seismology
DE: 8099 General or miscellaneous
SC: Seismology [S]
MN: Fall Meeting 2005