HR: 1340h
AN: SM33B-0450    [Abstracts]
TI: Non-adiabatic Bouncing Ion Clusters in the Plasma Sheet Boundary Layer Observed by Cluster-CIS
AU: * Keiling, A
EM: keiling@ssl.berkeley.edu
AF: UC Berkeley, 7 Gauss Way, Berkeley, 94720
AU: Parks, G
EM: parks@ssl.berkeley.edu
AF: UC Berkeley, 7 Gauss Way, Berkeley, 94720
AU: Reme, H
EM: reme@cesr.fr
AF: CESR, 9 ave de Colonel Roche, Toulouse, 31028
AU: Dandouras, I
EM: dandouras@cesr.fr
AF: CESR, 9 ave de Colonel Roche, Toulouse, 31028
AU: Bosqued, J
EM: bosqued@cesr.fr
AF: CESR, 9 ave de Colonel Roche, Toulouse, 31028
AU: Wilber, M
EM: wilber@ssl.berkeley.edu
AF: UC Berkeley, 7 Gauss Way, Berkeley, 94720
AU: McCarthy, M
EM: mccarthy@u.washington.edu
AF: Univ Washington, Box 357940, Seattle, 98195
AU: Kistler, L
EM: kistler@unh.edu
AF: Univ New Hampshire, Morse Hall, Durham, 03824
AU: Mouikis, C
EM: mouikis@unh.edu
AF: Univ New Hampshire, Morse Hall, Durham, 03824
AU: Klecker, B
EM: klecker@mpi.edu
AF: Max Planck Institut, Giessenbachstrasse, Garching, 85741
AU: Korth, A
EM: korth@mpi.edu
AF: Max-Planck Inst, Max-Planck-Str 2, Katlenburg-Lindau, 37191
AU: Lundin, R
EM: rickard.lundin@irf.se
AF: Swedish Inst Space Physics, POB 812, Kiruna, 98128
AU: Frey, H
EM: hfrey@ssl.berkeley.edu
AF: UC Berkeley, 7 Gauss Way, Berkeley, 94720
AB: We report on ion beams injected into the plasma sheet boundary layer (at or near the separatrix) at distances greater than 39 Re and up to 169 Re that bounced several times back and forth (up to three echoes) while remaining in coherent bunches before thermalizing in the central plasma sheet (CPS). These bouncing ion clusters (BIC) interacted with the far-tail current sheet with a possible curvature parameter, kappa, of less than 2. The existence of these BIC shows that ion beams can interact several times non-adiabatically with the far-tail current sheet and still remain coherent. Owing to the large-scale ExB drift, echoes also appeared in the CPS after several bounces. The echoes had higher energies compared to the initially injected ion cluster which can be attributed to additional non-adiabatic acceleration during their second and third interaction with the tail current sheet. After multiple bounces, the ion cluster became thermalized isotropic plasma mixing with the CPS. BIC events were identified on the basis of the energy dispersion slopes associated with the ions. Simple model calculations showed, however, that in the case of these far-tail ion injections the 1:3:5:etc.-ratios of travel distances for echoes, used as diagnostics for near-Earth adiabatic BIC, are not valid. This is largely due to a significant shortening of the tail field lines, caused by Earthward convection, during the large ion travel times. The model calculations also reproduced newly observed properties such as concave dispersion slopes for the echoes. Furthermore, we argue here that the energy dispersion of the BIC was dominated by a time-of-flight effect. The injection region for BIC events, determined on the basis of this time-of-flight interpretation, covered a broad range of ŽX (GSE)=26-40 Re. BIC events were dominantly observed during the substorm recovery phase and during quiet geomagnetic activity. We conclude that these nonadiabatic BIC are different from the adiabatic BIC that are routinely reported in the CPS.
DE: 2720 Energetic particles: trapped
DE: 2731 Magnetosphere: outer
DE: 2744 Magnetotail
DE: 2748 Magnetotail boundary layers
SC: SPA-Magnetospheric Physics [SM]
MN: Fall Meeting 2005