HR: 0800h
AN: SM41A-1176 [Abstracts]
TI: Probabilistic Analysis of International Space Station Plasma Interaction
AU: * Reddell, B
EM: brandon.d.reddell@boeing.com
AF: The Boeing Company, 13100 Space Center Blvd
M/C HB3-20, Houston, Tx 77050
United States
AU: Alred, J
EM: john.w.alred@boeing.com
AF: The Boeing Company, 13100 Space Center Blvd
M/C HB3-20, Houston, Tx 77050
United States
AU: Kramer, L
EM: Leonard.Kramer@boeing.com
AF: The Boeing Company, 13100 Space Center Blvd
M/C HB3-20, Houston, Tx 77050
United States
AU: Mikatarian, R
EM: ronald.r.mikatarian@boeing.com
AF: The Boeing Company, 13100 Space Center Blvd
M/C HB3-20, Houston, Tx 77050
United States
AU: Minow, J
EM: Joseph.I.Minow@nasa.gov
AF: NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Natural Environments Branch
EV13, Huntsville, Al 35812
United States
AU: Koontz, S
EM: steven.l.koontz@nasa.gov
AF: NASA Johnson Space Center, ES4, Houston, Tx 77058
United States
AB:
To date, the International Space Station (ISS) has been one of the largest objects flown in lower earth orbit (LEO). The ISS
utilizes high voltage solar arrays (160V) that are negatively grounded leading to pressurized elements that can float
negatively with respect to the plasma. Because laboratory measurements indicate a dielectric breakdown potential difference
of 80V, arcing could occur on the ISS structure. To overcome the possibility of arcing and clamp the potential of the
structure, two Plasma Contactor Units (PCUs) were designed, built, and flown. Also a limited amount of measurements of the
floating potential for the present ISS configuration were made by a Floating Potential Probe (FPP), indicating a minimum
potential of -24 Volts at the measurement location.
A predictive tool, the ISS Plasma Interaction Model (PIM) has been developed accounting for the solar array electron
collection, solar array mast wire and effective conductive area on the structure. The model has been used for predictions of
the present ISS configuration. The conductive area has been inferred based on available floating potential measurements.
Analysis of FPP and PCU data indicated distribution of the conductive area along the Russian segment of the ISS structure.
A significant input to PIM is the plasma environment. The International Reference Ionosphere (IRI 2001) was initially used to
obtain plasma temperature and density values. However, IRI provides mean parameters, leading to difficulties in
interpretation of on-orbit data, especially at eclipse exit where maximum charging can occur. This limits our predicative
capability. Satellite and Incoherent Scatter Radar (ISR) data of plasma parameters have also been collected. Approximately
130,000 electron temperature (Te) and density (Ne) pairs for typical ISS eclipse exit conditions have been extracted from the
reduced Langmuir probe data flown aboard the NASA DE-2 satellite. Additionally, another 18,000 Te and Ne pairs of ISR data
from several radar locations around the globe were used to assure consistency of the satellite data. PIM predictions for ISS
charging made with this data correlated very well with FPP data, indicating that the general physics of spacecraft charging
with high voltage solar arrays have been captured. The predictions also provided the probabilities of occurrences for ISS
charging. These probabilities give a numerical measure of the number of times when the ISS will approach or exceed the
vehicle plasma hazard conditions for each configuration.
In this paper we shall present the interaction mechanisms between the ISS and the surrounding plasma and give an overview of
the PIM components. PIM predictions are compared with available data followed by a discussion of the variability of plasma
parameters and the conductive area on the ISS. The ISS PIM will be further tested and verified as data from the Floating
Potential Measurement Unit become available, and construction of the ISS continues.
DE: 7800 SPACE PLASMA PHYSICS
DE: 7853 Spacecraft/atmosphere interactions
DE: 7855 Spacecraft sheaths, wakes, charging
SC: SPA-Magnetospheric Physics [SM]
MN: Fall Meeting 2005