HR: 0800h
AN: T41E-1356 [Abstracts]
TI: Generation and Evolution of Channels due to the Melt Chennel Instability
AU: * Mueller, K
EM: kmueller@geophysik.uni-frankfurt.de
AF: IMGF
Goethe-University, Feldbergstr. 47, Frankfurt, 60323
Germany
AU: Schmeling, H
EM: schmelin@geophysik.uni-frankfurt.de
AF: IMGF
Goethe-University, Feldbergstr. 47, Frankfurt, 60323
Germany
AB:
We investigate melt transport in partially molten rocks under different stress fieldsunder hydrous and anhydrous conditions.
We model such aggregates with the 2D-FD code FDCON [1] by means of a porous deformable matrix with melt to clarify the
following key questions:
Could channeling occur in a matrix containing a random melt distribution under a given stress field?
How do channels evolve during finite simple shear?
Is it possible to achieve a focussing of melt towards an MOR (dykes)?
How does a Plume influence the orientation of dykes?
In a deforming partially molten aggregate, weakening of the solid matrix due to the presence of melt creates an instability
in which melt is localized by the following mechanism: regions of initially high meltfraction are areas of low viscosity and
pressure, so that melt is drawn into these regions from higher pressure surroundings.This further enhances the melt
weakening,
producing a self-excited localization mechanism [2].
For both, simple as well as pure shear, the growth rate α for an inclined 1D sine pertubation is highest for
an orientation parallel to the direction of the maximum compressive stress (MCS).
α is proportional to the applied stress, the reverse of the Melt Retention Number [1] and the wavenumber k of the 1D
sine.
This also confirms the theoretical growth rate α found by Stevenson [2].
Small-scale simulations (~1 km×1 km box dimensions) with inclined 1D sine, 1D single channel-like
pertubations, 2D ellipses, random fields and large-scale Plume-MOR simulations are investigated.
In our isothermal models we found that the influence of water reduces the growth rate, in contrast to non-isothermal models
of Hall [3].
Under simple as well as pure shear (small-scale simulations), melt channels evolve from an irregular melt distribution (mean
porosity 3±0.5%) at angles parallel to the MCS (45° and 0°, resp.).
Upon further straining in the simple shear case they slightly rotate out of the orientation of maximum growth rate and partly
disrupt.
Even at later stages the mean channel orientation of the disintegrated melt inclusions shows an orientation parallel to the
MCS.
For this reason, it is sufficient to calculate the orientation of the MCS of a given model to determine the mean channel
orientation.
Applied to large-scale Plume-MOR simulations shows, that the majoroty of the ascending melt will reach the bottom of the
lithospere at distances of ≤80 km from the MOR.
From these distances melt could percolate towards the MOR due to the form of the lithospere (√t-law) [4].
On the distant side (>80 km), melt could either be deposited on the bottom of the lithospere or recycled back to lower
regions of the plumehead, from where it may try once more to reach the MOR.
[1] H. Schmeling. Partial melting and melt segregation in a Convecting mantle. Physics and chemistry of partially molten
rocks; N. Bagdassarov and D. Laporte and A. B. Thompson, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 141-178, 2000
[2] D.J. Stevenson. Spontaneous small-scale melt segregation in partial melts undergoing deformation. Geophys. Res. Lett.,
16(9):1067-1070, 1989
[3] C.E. Hall and E.M. Parmentier. Spontaneous melt localization in a deforming solidwith viscosity variations due to water
weakening. Geophys. Res. Lett., 27:9-12, 2000
[4] P.S. Hall and C. Kincaid. Melting, dehydration, and the dynamics of off-axis plume-ridge interaction. Geochem. Geophy.
Geosys., 9(4):1-19, 2003
DE: 8400 VOLCANOLOGY
DE: 8416 Mid-oceanic ridge processes (1032, 3614)
SC: Tectonophysics [T]
MN: Fall Meeting 2005