HR: 1340h
AN: T53B-1419    [Abstracts]
TI: Constraints on Pore Pressure in Subduction Zones From Geotechnical Tests and Physical Properties Data
AU: * Saffer, D M
EM: dsaffer@geosc.psu.edu
AF: Dept. of Geosciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 United States
AU: McKiernan, A W
EM: amckiern@geosc.psu.edu
AF: Dept. of Geosciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 United States
AB: At subduction zones, as incoming sediments are either offscraped or underthrust at the trench, elevated pore pressures result from the combination of rapid loading and low permeability. Pore pressure within underthrust sediment is especially important for the mechanical strength of the plate boundary fault system, because the main décollement localizes immediately above this sediment, and at many subduction zones steps downward into it. Because the underthrust sediment undergoes progressive uniaxial (vertical) strain, quantitative estimates of in situ pore pressure can be obtained by several methods, including: (1) maximum past burial stress ( P_v'}) from laboratory consolidation tests on core samples, and (2) observed compaction trends in boreholes. These methods allow a detailed view of pore pressure and its variability down-section, providing insight into dewatering processes and the evolution of shear strength relevant to early development of the décollement. Geotechnical tests also provide independent measurement of the coefficient of consolidation ( C_v), compressibility ( m_v), and permeability (k) of sediment samples, which can be used to parameterize forward models of pressure generation. Here, I discuss pore pressure estimates derived from (1) consolidation tests on core samples, and (2) observed porosity profiles, along transects where ODP drilling has sampled sediment at the Nankai, N. Barbados, and Costa Rican subduction zones. At all three margins, the two independent methods yield consistent results, and indicate development of significant overpressures that increase systematically with distance from the trench. The values are in good agreement with direct measurements in 2 instrumented boreholes at Barbados, maximum and minimum bounds from the known loading rate, and results of 2-D numerical models of fluid flow. Inferred pressures document nearly undrained conditions at the base of the section (excess pressures equal to the load emplaced by subduction burial), and partially drained conditions at the top (excess pressures of ~40% of the undrained response at Costa Rica, ~50-60% at Nankai, and ~90-100% at Barbados). The spatial pattern of excess pore pressure is most consistent with upward drainage to a highly permeable décollement, to distances of at least 5-10 km landward of the trench. When directly measured values of m_v and k from laboratory geotechnical experiments are incorporated into simple 1-D models of vertical dewatering, simulated pore pressures are consistent with those inferred from consolidation tests and porosity data. Model results suggest that severe underconsolidation should persist for tens of km from the trench; notably, simulated underconsolidation is diminished by 20-30 km landward of the trench at Nankai, broadly coincident with the locations of both diminished seismic reflection amplitude observed at the décollement and the updip extent of coseismic slip. The consistent results achieved at these three margins indicate that: (1) geotechnical tests can provide viable estimates of in situ pore pressure, at least at shallow depths, and (2) laboratory-derived values of permeability and sediment compressibility may be representative of in situ properties, despite collection at small spatial scale and over short times. However, significant uncertainty exists in projecting models to greater depth using geotechnical parameters from shallow samples; more detailed laboratory investigations are clearly needed to better understand the roles of temperature, rate, and diagenetic effects.
DE: 8045 Role of fluids
SC: Tectonophysics [T]
MN: Fall Meeting 2005