HR: 14:45h
AN: U53B-04 [Abstracts]
TI: The Identification of Filters and Interdependencies for Effective Resource Allocation: Coupling the
Mitigation of Natural Hazards to Economic Development.
AU: * Agar, S M
EM: susan.m.agar@exxonmobil.com
AF: ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company, P.O. Box 2189
GW3 966A, Houston, TX 77252
United States
AU: Kunreuther, H
EM: kunreuther@wharton.upenn.edu
AF: The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
AB:
Policy formulation for the mitigation and management of risks posed by natural hazards requires that governments confront
difficult decisions for resource allocation and be able to justify their spending. Governments also need to recognize when
spending offers little improvement and the circumstances in which relatively small amounts of spending can make substantial
differences. Because natural hazards can have detrimental impacts on local and regional economies, patterns of economic
development can also be affected by spending decisions for disaster mitigation. This paper argues that by mapping
interdependencies among physical, social and economic factors, governments can improve resource allocation to mitigate the
risks of natural hazards while improving economic development on local and regional scales.
Case studies of natural hazards in Turkey have been used to explore specific "filters" that act to modify short- and
long-term outcomes. Pre-event filters can prevent an event from becoming a natural disaster or change a routine event into a
disaster. Post-event filters affect both short and long-term recovery and development. Some filters cannot be easily modified
by spending (e.g., rural-urban migration) but others (e.g., land-use practices) provide realistic spending targets. Net
social benefits derived from spending, however, will also depend on the ways by which filters are linked, or so-called
"interdependencies". A single weak link in an interdependent system, such as a power grid, can trigger a cascade of failures.
Similarly, weak links in social and commercial networks can send waves of disruption through communities. Conversely, by
understanding the positive impacts of interdependencies, spending can be targeted to maximize net social benefits while
mitigating risks and improving economic development.
Detailed information on public spending was not available for this study but case studies illustrate how networks of
interdependent filters can modify social benefits and costs. For example, spending after the 1992 Erzincan earthquake
targeted local businesses but limited alternative employment, labor losses and diminished local markets all contributed to
economic stagnation. Spending after the 1995 Dinar earthquake provided rent subsidies, supporting a major exodus from the
town. Consequently many local people were excluded from reconstruction decisions and benefits offered by reconstruction
funds. After the 1999 Marmara earthquakes, a 3-year economic decline in Yalova illustrates the vulnerability of local
economic stability to weak regulation enforcement by a few agents.
A resource allocation framework indicates that government-community relations, lack of economic diversification, beliefs, and
compensation are weak links for effective spending. Stronger positive benefits could be achieved through spending to target
land-use regulation enforcement, labor losses, time-critical needs of small businesses, and infrastructure. While the impacts
of the Marmara earthquakes were devastating, strong commercial networks and international interests helped to re-establish
the regional economy. Interdependencies may have helped to drive a recovery. Smaller events in eastern Turkey, however, can
wipe out entire communities and can have long-lasting impacts on economic development. These differences may accelerate rural
to urban migration and perpetuate regional economic divergence in the country.
1: Research performed in the Wharton MBA Program, Univ. of Pennsylvania.
DE: 1880 Water management (6334)
DE: 6304 Benefit-cost analysis
DE: 6309 Decision making under uncertainty
SC: Union [U]
MN: Fall Meeting 2005