HR: 0800h
AN: GC51A-1056    [Abstracts]
TI: Phytoplankton distributions and their nutrient environment in the Eastern Bering Sea.
AU: * ZHANG, J
EM: jzhang@sci.toyama-u.ac.jp
AF: Faculty of Science, Toyama University, 3190 Gofuku, Toyama, 9308555 Japan
AU: NISHITANI, H
EM: hironobu56@k4.dion.ne.jp
AF: Faculty of Science, Toyama University, 3190 Gofuku, Toyama, 9308555 Japan
AU: NARITA, H
EM: hisashin@scc.u-tokai.ac.jp
AF: Marine Science and Technology, Tokai University, 3-20-1 Seto, Simizu, Sizuoka, 4248610_@ Japan
AU: JORDAN, R W
EM: sh081@kdeve.kj.yamagata-u.ac.jp
AF: Faculty of Science, Yamagata University, 1-4-12 Koshiragawa, Yamagata, 9908560 Japan
AB: After 1997, coccolithophorids blooms have been frequently observed by research vessels and satellites in the Eastern Bering Sea shelf, where diatoms have previously been dominate. Here, we present CTD, Chl-a, nutrient and phytoplankton data collected during cruises of the T/S Oshoro-Maru and R/V Mirai vessels from 2000 to 2003. Our goal is to refine the relation between phytoplankton distribution and water characteristics, and the controlling features of coccolithophorids blooms in the Eearstern Bering Sea. Samplings were carried out alone 166_E#8249;W from 55_E#8249;N to 59_E#8249;N. For cell counting, seawater samples were filtered through a 25-mm Millipore HA filter, and identification and counting of phytoplankton was performed with a scanning electron microscope. The scale of bloom and abundance of coccolithophorids were different in each year. The most dominant phytoplankton group was coccolithophorids in 2000, which agrees with the large bloom observed by satellite. In 2001, diatoms dominated at 70% and coccolithophorids accounted for 30% at 58, 58.5_E#8249;N. In 2002 and 2003, diatoms dominated at nearly 100% at all stations. Coccolithophorids abundance was nearly halted by pycnocline, since coccolithophorids existed in the middle shelf domain, which is known to be an area of cold-water pool distribution. The difference in density between the surface mixed layer and the cold-water pool gradually increased from 1980 to 2002, that is, seawater stratification in the middle shelf domain was strengthened as the result of the increased surface temperature and decreased salinity that have occurred recently. When stratification strengthens, the supply of nutrients to the surface from the cold-water pool is reduced. Consequently, coccolithophorids take precedence over diatoms in this condition. However, if the decreased salinity in the surface water depended on the increased river discharge, then the nutrients in the surface water would increase. River discharge has two peaks (spring and late summer) in one year (Chikita, 2001). Since river water contains high volumes of silicate and iron, an increase in river discharge would lead to the predominance of diatoms. The frequency and timing of storms, which influence the thickness of the surface mixed layer, may be another controlling factor of coccolithophorids blooms. In fact, there was a second peak in October 2000 and in August 2001. In 2000, the thickness of the surface mixed layer increased from July to September. Because the timing of storms and river discharges in summer controlled the stratification in the middle shelf domain, it greatly influenced the species_f composition of phytoplankton. In 2002 and 2003, the phytoplankton concetrations distribute peaks respectively at the south and north. The dominant classes are centric diatoms in the south, and is penate diatoms in the north, caused by defferent nutrients and temperature distribution. The sources of nutrients to the Estern bering Sea can be classified into three groups: up welling at the shelf edge, from the cold water pool, and from riverwater. The nutrients of surface water are high in the south and are low in the north, and dispense the diffenrent phytoplankton distribution.
DE: 4805 Biogeochemical cycles (1615)
DE: 4835 Inorganic marine chemistry
DE: 4845 Nutrients and nutrient cycling
DE: 4855 Plankton
DE: 4800 OCEANOGRAPHY: BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL
SC: Global Climate Change [GC]
MN: 2004 AGU Fall Meeting