HR: 11:35h
AN: H32B-06 [Abstracts]
TI: Everglades restoration and the search for a supermodel
AU: * Mitchell-Bruker, S
EM: sbruker@netscape.net
AF: South Florida Natural Resources Center, Everglades National Park, 950 N. Krome Ave, Homestead, FL 33030
United States
AB:
Integrated watershed management in South Florida has evolved over the past century as a necessity. The densely developed
South Florida Coast and the Everglades are inextricably linked through hydrology. Agriculture and urban development were
made possible by draining the Everglades. Ironically, without the vast store of water provided by the Everglades to the
Biscayne Aquifer, the intense development of the South Florida Coast would not have been impossible. The impacts of early
Everglades drainage were felt almost immediately and water managers in South Florida quickly learned that the management of
Lake Okeechobee and the Everglades effected social, economic and natural systems throughout South Florida. South Florida
Water Management District engineers were pioneers in integrated watershed management, developing a watershed management model
for South Florida in the early 1970s. This model has evolved over the years and continues to be the only model available
for integrating the complex dynamics of water management and hydrology from Lake Okeechobee to Florida Bay. With the
authorization of an extensive 30 year project to restore the Everglades, the need for better and more sophisticated modeling
approaches is apparent. Numerous efforts are underway to develop models that simulate all or part of the complex
interactions between physical, biological and social systems that drive the management of the South Florida hydrology. What
remains elusive is a unified vision for integrated modeling to meet the needs of the entire system. The key questions in
reaching a unified vision relates to modeling strategy. Should there be a single model that addresses all of the management
issues, i.e. a supermodel, or should there be an assortment of models that address individual management issues
independently? Currently, efforts are underway following both approaches. Issues are explored that arise from these efforts
including trade-offs between scale and detail, the dangers of over-simplification, balance between complexity and
over-parameterization, the need for transparency and flexibility, ways to include uncertainty and risk, and efficient use of
limited scientific and engineering resources. Recommendations are made for a modeling approach that allows for maximum
flexibility using a diverse set of models in an intergrated modeling environment.
UR: http://www.evergladesplan.org
DE: 6309 Decision making under uncertainty
DE: 6615 Legislation and regulation
DE: 1803 Anthropogenic effects
DE: 1836 Hydrologic budget (1655)
DE: 1600 GLOBAL CHANGE (New category)
SC: Hydrology [H]
MN: 2004 AGU Fall Meeting