HR: 1340h
AN: H33F-0536 [Abstracts]
TI: Local Discontinuous Galerkin Approximations And Variable Step Size, Variable Order Time Integration For
Richards' Equation
AU: * Li, H
EM: huinali@email.unc.edu
AF: UNC, Dept. of Env. Sci. and Engr, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27759
United States
AU: Farthing, M W
EM: matthew_farthing@unc.edu
AF: UNC, Dept. of Env. Sci. and Engr, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27759
United States
AU: Dawson, C N
EM: clint@ices.utexas.edu
AF: UT-AUSTIN, Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712
United States
AU: Miller, C T
EM: casey_miller@unc.edu
AF: UNC, Dept. of Env. Sci. and Engr, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27759
United States
AB:
Numerical simulation of Richards' equation continues to be difficult. It is highly nonlinear under common constitutive
relations and exhibits sharp fronts in both the pressure head and volume fraction for many problems of interest.
For a number of multiphase flow problems, the use of variable order and variable step size temporal discretizations has shown
some advantages. However, the spatial discretizations commonly used for variably saturated flow are dominated by
nonadaptive, low-order finite difference and finite element methods. Discontinuous Galerkin (DG) finite element methods have
received significant attention in a number of fields for hyperbolic PDE's and, more recently, for elliptic and parabolic
problems. DG approaches like the local discontinuous Galerkin (LDG) method are appealing for modeling subsurface flow since
they can lead to velocity fields that are locally mass-conservative without the need for auxiliary variables or alternative
meshes. DG discretizations are also inherently local and so better-suited for unstructured meshes and $h$-$p$ adaption
strategies than traditional methods. While some work has been done recently for multiphase subsurface flow, there are a
range of issues related to the performance of DG methods for highly nonlinear parabolic problems like Richards' equation that
have not been investigated fully.
In this work, we consider the combination of higher order adaptive time integration with an LDG spatial discretization for
Richards' equation. We compare this approach to standard low-order methods for a series of test problems and consider a
number of issues including the methods' relative accuracy and computational efficiency.
DE: 1829 Groundwater hydrology
DE: 1875 Unsaturated zone
SC: Hydrology [H]
MN: 2004 AGU Fall Meeting