HR: 1340h
AN: H43E-0412 [Abstracts]
TI: Measuring uncertainty in modeling toxic concentrations in the Niagara River
AU: * Franceschini, S
EM: sf5@buffalo.edu
AF: Dept. of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, 207
Jarvis Hall
North Campus, Buffalo, NY 14260
United States
AU: Tsai, C
EM: ctsai4@buffalo.edu
AF: Dept. of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, 207
Jarvis Hall
North Campus, Buffalo, NY 14260
United States
AB:
In spite of the renowned history of the Niagara River as a recreational and tourist attraction, little is known about the
variability of the natural phenomena linked to the fate and transport of contaminants along the natural channel that connects
Lake Erie to Lake Ontario. Previous studies of the Niagara River have focused on water quality modeling using
one-dimensional deterministic models. Only recently, the work by Franceschini (2004) has evaluated probabilistically the
influence on the estimated concentrations at the end of the Niagara River of few model variables and parameters with inherent
variability. Several factors contribute to the uncertainty of the estimated concentrations. Toxic concentrations in the
Niagara River depend on the randomly varying magnitude of the flow, the processes of decay, volatilization, and sorption
which the substances undergo, the rate of contaminated suspended sediment deposition and resuspension, the variability of the
input sources and seasonal schedules of water diversions for hydropower production.
This paper proposes to analyze the variability of the toxic concentrations in the Niagara River with respect to the
variability of selected hydraulic components (e.g. flow velocity and dispersion coefficient), upstream incoming
concentrations and non-point source loadings. A comparison of the uncertainty of the results obtained during different water
diversion schedules for hydropower productions will be also analyzed. The influence of climate change will be investigated
with respect to temperature and precipitation variations.
The uncertainty of the model results will be analyzed by Point Estimate Methods (PEMs) and specifically the Modified
Rosenblueth method (Tsai and Franceschini 2004) will be used. The application of PEMs to environmental engineering problems
has recently attracted some attention. Compared to other uncertainty analysis methods, PEMs require a substantially smaller
computational effort, for a comparable degree of accuracy in the estimation of the first few statistical moments of a model
output distribution. Furthermore, the probabilistic analysis can be used as a more rigorous method to compare the modeled
results with established water quality criteria. In this study, the toxic concentrations computed at the end of the Niagara
River and their estimated variability will be compared with field data measurements. The purpose of this comparison is
two-fold: (a) to evaluate the accuracy of the Modified Rosenblueth method in measuring the uncertainty of toxic concentration
in the Niagara River and (b) to quantify the risk of exceeding established water quality standards when such uncertainty is
accounted for.
DE: 1869 Stochastic processes
DE: 1871 Surface water quality
DE: 1894 Instruments and techniques
SC: Hydrology [H]
MN: 2004 AGU Fall Meeting