HR: 17:45h
AN: P24A-08 INVITED [Abstracts]
TI: A View from the Cheap Seats: MER and its Implications for Future Mars Exploration
AU: * Leshin, L A
EM: laurie.leshin@asu.edu
AF: Arizona State University, Geological Sciences/
Meteorite Studies
Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404
United States
AU: Minitti, M
EM: michelle.minitti@asu.edu
AF: Arizona State University, Geological Sciences/
Meteorite Studies
Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404
United States
AU: Cosarinsky, M
EM: mariana.cosarinsky@asu.edu
AF: Arizona State University, Geological Sciences/
Meteorite Studies
Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404
United States
AU: McAdam, A
EM: amy.mcadam@asu.edu
AF: Arizona State University, Geological Sciences/
Meteorite Studies
Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404
United States
AU: Niles, P
EM: paul.niles@asu.edu
AF: Arizona State University, Geological Sciences/
Meteorite Studies
Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404
United States
AB:
The spectacular success of the Mars Exploration Rover mission is reflected by the exciting scientific discoveries that Spirit
and Opportunity have made concerning habitability potential and geologic history of two sites on Mars. The apparent
discovery of strong evidence for the presence of liquid water at the Opportunity site is of historic importance (although at
the time of this writing we must note that there is not yet any peer-reviewed publication of this result). But perhaps even
more importantly, the success of MER provides key validation of a strategy and approach to Mars exploration. Here, we
highlight some of the strategic successes, as well as lessons learned for refining our approach to Mars exploration, and for
future exploration endeavors across the solar system and beyond.
Almost more than imaginable, MER has validated both the "follow the water" strategy and the "seek-in situ-sample" approach of
the Mars Exploration Program developed by a broad, inclusive group of Mars explorers. Seeking interesting, water-relevant
sites with remote observations from orbit resulted in one clear success at Meridiani, and in perhaps what is most
optimistically termed "delayed success" at Gusev. Three lessons from this are clear. First, it's always better to fly two
spacecraft! Second, significant mobility enables greatly enhanced science return. Third, mineralogical evidence appears more
reliable than geomorphic evidence if the goal is to seek preserved evidence of aqueous processes (Pathfinder results also
support this observation), although the combination of mineralogical information with high-resolution imagery is almost
certainly the best way to optimize for success. The 2005 Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter's spectral mapping and imaging
capability will thus be critical to future landing site selection. And yet, it is important to note that in spite of
mineralogical evidence pointing to Meridiani as a site of "aqueous interest", and the detailed regional geological
observations leading to multiple hypotheses for the formation environment of this site, virtually all hypotheses were
incorrect or of insufficient detail to predict the extraordinary discoveries in the sedimentary strata at Meridiani. In
other words, "in situ" exploration resulted in significant revision of ALL previously proposed hypotheses, which validates
the strategy of performing in situ exploration. It is highly likely that "sampling," returning samples to Earth-based labs
from sites that have been previously explored in situ, will result in a similar revolution in thinking about the history of a
site. Thus, sample return missions should remain a high priority in the exploration strategy. Finally, the mission success
of MER is the direct result of the hard work and dedication of one of the most well-integrated science-engineering teams in
space exploration history. The value of team integration to maximizing the success of MER is perhaps the most enduring
legacy of the mission to the exploration community. As we move forward returning humans to the Moon, then on to Mars and
beyond, we should continue to strive for the integration of scientists and engineers into unified exploration teams.
DE: 5415 Erosion and weathering
DE: 5464 Remote sensing
DE: 5480 Volcanism (8450)
DE: 5494 Instruments and techniques
DE: 6225 Mars
SC: Planetary Sciences [P]
MN: 2004 AGU Fall Meeting