HR: 09:20h
AN: S11C-06 [Abstracts]
TI: Strongly localized near-coastal generation areas for
$\sim$4 s microseismic noise in the North-East Atlantic
AU: Dahm, T
EM: dahm@dkrz.de
AF: Institut f. Geophysik, Univ. Hamburg, Bundesstr. 55, Hamburg,, 20146
Germany
AU: * Tilmann, F J
EM: tilmann@esc.cam.ac.uk
AF: Bullard Laboratories
Department of Earth Sciences
University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0EZ
United Kingdom
AU: Morgan, J
EM: jpm@geology.geo.cornell.edu
AF: IFM-GEOMAR, Wischofstr 1-3, Kiel, 24148
Germany
AB:
Mapping the generation areas for ocean-generated microseismic noise is
of importance
both for the planning of future ocean bottom experiments and for the
use of historical seismological microseismic noise data as a proxy for
ocean wave height in historical climate studies.
We report on the results of a large aperture (400 km), 3 month pilot deployment of 10 ocean bottom
stations (7 seismometers/hydrophones, 3 hydrophones) in the North
Atlantic south of Iceland. The noise level was found to be highly
variable both with time and for the different stations, and shows
marked variability between bands.
By correlating noise levels recorded on the ocean bottom stations as
well as on nearby land stations with wave height data for the
same period, we map out estimated generation areas for
microseismic noise. For
high frequency noise (0.5--2 Hz) the noise turns out to be
predominantly related to local waves, and for lower
frequency noise ($<$0.3~Hz) noise seems to originate mainly in a few source
regions near the coasts of Ireland, Scotland and Iceland.
The
generation areas for the ocean bottom instruments were similar to
those of land instruments in the same region. It should thus be
possible to estimate the generation areas for proposed future ocean bottom
installations based on nearby land stations, and thus allow better
estimates of expected noise levels than those derived from regional
averages of typical weather conditions. The directivity of noise
suggests optimised array designs for noise suppression.
Below the microseismic band and at the relatively noisier stations, the vertical seismograms at
frequencies below $\sim$0.3 Hz could be substantially enhanced by removing the part
correlated with the horizontal components, suggesting that noise
introduced by instrument tilt was considerable at those stations.
DE: 7299 General or miscellaneous
DE: 4247 Marine meteorology
DE: 3094 Instruments and techniques
SC: Seismology [S]
MN: 2004 AGU Fall Meeting