HR: 17:15h
AN: S44A-06    [Abstracts]
TI: Contrasts in Seismicity Along the 1964 Great Alaska Earthquake Rupture Zone
AU: * Doser, D I
EM: doser@geo.utep.edu
AF: Univ. Texas at El Paso, Dept. Geol. Sciences, El Paso, TX 79968 United States
AU: Veilleux, A M
EM: veilleux@geo.utep.edu
AF: Univ. Texas at El Paso, Dept. Geol. Sciences, El Paso, TX 79968 United States
AU: Flores, C
EM: cflores@es.ucsc.edu
AF: Univ. Calif. at Santa Cruz, Earth Sciences Dept., Santa Cruz, CA 95064 United States
AU: Brown, W A
EM: wesley@geo.utep.edu
AF: Univ. Texas at El Paso, Dept. Geol. Sciences, El Paso, TX 79968 United States
AB: We have examined seismicity occurring over 35 years prior to and following the 1964 great Alaska earthquake. These studies indicate that the regions associated with the Prince William Sound (PWS) and Kodiak asperities have behaved very different seismically over time. Prior to 1964, the PWS region experienced an increase in crustal seismicity, especially in the region located down-dip of maximum slip in 1964. Since 1964 this same region has been aseismic at the M$>$ 3 level. PWS intraslab seismicity has remained relatively constant, although down-dip migration of M $>$ 4.5 events was observed following the 1964 mainshock. Low-level seismicity has occurred at the northeastern end of the Kodiak asperity throughout the past 70 years, but much of the central Kodiak asperity has been aseismic at the M $>$ 5 level. In contrast, the southwestern edge of the Kodiak asperity has been associated with moderate to large (Mw 5.5 to 7) crustal, interplate, and intraslab events throughout the past 70 years. These changes in seismic behavior along the 1964 rupture zone are consistent with GPS/geodesy estimates of seismic coupling across the interface and with known changes in plate geometry.
DE: 7230 Seismicity and seismotectonics
SC: Seismology [S]
MN: 2004 AGU Fall Meeting