HR: 0800h
AN: SA51B-0256 [Abstracts]
TI: Validation of the Objective Analysis Algorithm IDA3D
AU: * Bust, G S
EM: gbust@arlut.utexas.edu
AU: Garner, T W
EM: garner@arlut.utexas.edu
AU: Taylor, B
EM: taylor@arlut.utexas.edu
AB:
We have developed a set of metrics and skill scores to analyze the
performance of the objective analysis algorithm Ionospheric Data
Assimilation Three-Dimensional (IDA3D).
The objective of the skill score is to quantify
the improvement in model predictions after either assimilation of a
new data source, or improvement in the model itself. The metrics
chosen to be evaluated by the skill score include electron density in
the E-regin, F-region, and topside of the ionosphere, total electron
content (TEC), F-region peak height and F-region layer thickness.
The metrics can
be sub-binned into different
geographic regions, solar and magnetic activity levels and time of
day. For a first principles data assimilation model that is capable
of forecasting, the metric can also be a function of prediction time
beyond the analysis time.
The skill score we have developed begins with a pure climate
prediction of the metric values. Then we run the data assimilative
model and produce assimilative prediction of the metric values. The
skill score is then given as
\begin{equation}
\label{eqn:skill}
S = 1.0 - \frac{<|\vec D - \vec T|>}{<|\vec M - \vec T|>}.
\end{equation}
Where $\vec D$ is the array of metric values ouput from the data
assimilation model, $\vec T$ is the independent measurements of the
metric that serve as ``truth'', and $\vec M$ is the array of climate
predictions of the metric values. The skill is
a function of time in the sense that every time the data
assimilative model is improved we generate new skill scores. The values of
the skill score range from $1.0$ for when the data assimilative model
is perfect (that is agrees with the measurements), to $0.0$ when the
data assimilative model is no better than the climate predictions, to
negative infinity as the data assimilative model does much worse than
climate.
We will present preliminary results for several days of analysis with incoherent
scatter observatins of electron density serving as truth.
DE: 6982 Tomography and imaging
DE: 2447 Modeling and forecasting
DE: 2494 Instruments and techniques
SC: SPA-Aeronomy [SA]
MN: 2004 AGU Fall Meeting