HR: 0800h
AN: SM41A-1103 [Abstracts]
TI: Correlation Between Particle Injections Observed at Geosynchronous Orbit and the Dst Index During
Geomagnetic Storms
AU: Moon, G
EM: kafemoon@hanmail.net
AF: Department of Astronomy and Atmospheric Sciences, Kyungpook National University, 1370 Sankyuk-Dong,
Buk-ku, Daegu, 702-701
Korea, Republic of
AU: * Ahn, B
EM: bhahn@knu.ac.kr
AF: Department of Earth Science, Kyungpook National University, 1370 Sankyuk-Dong, Buk-ku, Daegu, 702-701
Korea, Republic of
AU: Kamide, Y
EM: kamide@stelab.nagoya-u.ac.jp
AF: Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory, Nagoya University, Honohara 3-13, Toyokawa, 442-8507
Japan
AU: Reeves, G D
EM: reeves@lanl.gov
AF: Los Alamos National Laboratory, NIS-1 MS D-466, Los Alamos, NM 87545
United States
AB:
To understand the relationship between geomagnetic storms and substorms, we examine the correlation between dispersionless
proton injections observed by geosynchronous satellites and the Dst index during geomagnetic storms. We utilize geomagnetic
storms occurred during the period of 1997$-$2002, categorizing them into four classes according to the minimum Dst value,
Dst$_{min}$; Severe (Dst$_{min}$$ <$ $-$200 nT), intense ($-$200 nT $\leq$ Dst$_{min}$$ <$$-$100 nT), moderate ($-$100 nT
$\leq$ Dst$_{min}$$ <$$-$50 nT), and weak ($-$50 nT $\leq$ Dst$_{min}$$ <$$-$30 nT) storms. We use the proton flux with the
energy range from 50 keV to 670 keV observed by the LANL geosynchronous satellites located in the dark hemisphere from 1800
LT to 0600 LT. It is not possible to deduce the amount of the total energy injection into the inner magnetosphere from
measurements only by one or two satellites. Nonetheless, we may obtain a quantity that is proportional to the true injection
rate during magnetic storms by estimating the flux increase expressed in terms of the flux ratio (f$_{max}$/f$_{pre\_ave}$)
and the number of injections, where f$_{pre\_ave}$ and f$_{max}$ represent the average flux of pre-storm level and onset
level, respectively. Thus, we propose to introduce a parameter, ›r’total energy injection parameter (TEIP)›r_, defined by
the product of the flux ratio and the number of injections, as an indicator of the energy injected into the inner
magnetosphere. To determine the phase dependence of the substorm contribution to the development of geomagnetic storm, we
examine this quantity for the main and recovery phases separately. Several interesting points are noted particularly for the
main phase of storms. First, the number of particle injections tends to increase with the storm size. Second, the flux ratio
(f$_{max}$/f$_{pre\_ave}$) also tends to increase with the storm size. The correlation coefficient between Dst$_{min}$ and
the flux ratio is high, for example, 0.84 for the 50$\sim$75 keV energy channel. Third, there is also a significantly high
correlation between TEIP and Dst$_{min}$. Particularly, the correlation coefficients are very high, above 0.85, for those
channels of energy, 50$\sim$400 keV, which represent the typical energy range of ring current particles. These results
indicate that the substorm expansion activity is higher during the main phase than the recovery phase, suggesting that the
substorm expansion activity seems to be closely associated with the development of magnetic storms. Fourth, particle
injections during the recovery phase of a storm tend to make the storm last longer. This tendency is particularly prominent
for more intense storms.
DE: 2716 Energetic particles, precipitating
DE: 2760 Plasma convection
DE: 2778 Ring current
DE: 2788 Storms and substorms
SC: SPA-Magnetospheric Physics [SM]
MN: 2004 AGU Fall Meeting