HR: 1340h
AN: T33A-1336    [Abstracts]
TI: Global Analysis of Upper Mantle Anisotropy Using Automated SKS Splitting Measurements
AU: * Evans, M S
EM: matt@isc.ac.uk
AF: International Seismological Centre, Pipers Lane, Thatcham, Berkshire, RG19 4NS United Kingdom
AU: * Evans, M S
EM: matt@isc.ac.uk
AF: School of Earth Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT United Kingdom
AU: Kendall, J
EM: kendall@earth.leeds.ac.uk
AF: School of Earth Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT United Kingdom
AU: Willemann, R J
EM: Raymond.Willemann@nnsa.doe.gov
AF: National Nuclear Security Administration, NA-22, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20585 United States
AB: We have developed an automated method to measure shear wave splitting and applied it to SKS phases archived by various data centres. Using an automated system we are able to process data in a quantity and with a consistency not possible with manual measurements. To date we have processed over 100,000 station/event combinations from over 250 stations distributed globally, although our stringent quality control measures mean that only around 2 percent produce reliable estimates of splitting. When a polarised shear wave passes through an anisotropic medium, it is split into two perpendicular S-waves that are separated in time. In measuring splitting, we seek a polarisation angle and time shift that removes the effect of the anisotropy, minimising either the energy on the transverse component or the smaller of the two eigenvalues calculated from the covariance matrix. We report results from both methods, to allow consistency in comparisons with the results of other researchers and because we find consistent differences in results at some stations. Error estimates are calculated using both the methods of Silver and Chan (1991) and Sandvol and Hearn (1994). Where it is possible to compare, we find that our automated results agree well with manual measurements. The quality of results at individual stations is variable, being influenced both by the volume of available data (determined by station deployment date and the distribution of natural seismicity), and the performance of the STA/LTA picker used to define the start of the SKS window. When we have reliable results from a range of back azimuths, we compare the distribution of results with those predicted from single and multiple layers of anisotropy. Where this is not possible we report the polarisation angle and lag time for the most convincing splitting measurement. Where even this is not possible and where a sufficient number of events have been processed, a station is interpreted as a null, which may mean that it is underlain by an isotropic or transversely isotropic mantle. For stations suggesting either single layer anisotropy or where an individual splitting measurement has been used, we find an average lag value of 1.15 seconds. There seems to be some relation between splitting parameters and tectonic environment. These results are available through the ISC website and provide an aid to studies of anisotropy in the Earth.
DE: 8120 Dynamics of lithosphere and mantle--general
DE: 7218 Lithosphere and upper mantle
SC: Tectonophysics [T]
MN: 2004 AGU Fall Meeting