HR: 0800h
AN: V51B-0540 [Abstracts]
TI: Paleomagnetic Tests of Global Plate Reconstructions with Fixed and Moving Hotspots
AU: * Andrews, D L
EM: dandrews@jhu.edu
AF: Department of Earth Science, Rice University, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77005
United States
AU: Gordon, R G
EM: rgg@esci.rice.edu
AF: Department of Earth Science, Rice University, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77005
United States
AU: Horner-Johnson, B C
EM: ben@esci.rice.edu
AF: Department of Earth Science, Rice University, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77005
United States
AB:
Three distinct approaches have been used in prior work to estimate the motion of the Pacific basin plates relative to the
surrounding continents. The first approach is to use the global plate motion circuit through Antarctica (e.g., the Pacific
plate to the Antarctic plate to the African plate to the North American plate). An update to this approach is to incorporate
the modest mid-Tertiary motion between East and West Antarctica estimated by Cande et al. (2000). A recently proposed
second approach is to take an alternative circuit for the early Tertiary of the Pacific plate to the Australian plate to the
East Antarctic plate to the African plate to the North American plate (Steinberger et al. 2004). The third approach is to
assume that the hotspots in the Pacific Ocean are fixed relative to those in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans (e.g.,
Engebretson et al., 1986), which we recently showed indicates motion between East and West Antarctica of 800 $\pm$ 500 km
near the Ross Sea Embayment.
The first approach (global plate motion circuit through Antarctica) indicates very rapid motion between Pacific and
Indo-Atlantic hotspots during the early Tertiary (e.g., Raymond et al. 2000).
The second approach (global plate motion circuit through Australia) indicates slower, but still substantial, motion between
Pacific and Indo-Atlantic hotspots (Steinberger et al. 2004).
Because each of the three approaches predicts distinctly different motion between the Pacific plate and the continental
plates, they can be tested with paleomagnetic data. The results of such tests indicate that the first approach leads to
systematic and significant misfits between Pacific and non-Pacific early Tertiary and Late Cretaceous paleomagnetic poles.
The second approach leads to slightly smaller misfits. In contrast, the circuit based on fixed hotspots brings the Pacific
and non-Pacific paleomagnetic poles into consistency.
Thus the paleomagnetic data decisively favor fixed hotspots over the alternative approaches and suggests that motion between
hotspots is substantially less than inferred by Steinberger et al. (2004).
DE: 8121 Dynamics, convection currents and mantle plumes
DE: 3040 Plate tectonics (8150, 8155, 8157, 8158)
DE: 1525 Paleomagnetism applied to tectonics (regional, global)
SC: Volcanology, Geochemistry, Petrology [V]
MN: 2004 AGU Fall Meeting