HR: 1340h
AN: B13C-1382 [Abstracts]
TI: Enhancing Potentially Plant-Available Lead Concentrations in Contaminated Residential Soils Using a Biodegradable Chelating Agent
AU: * Andra, S
EM: syamsundar.andra@utsa.edu
AF: Environmental Science, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio,
TX 78249, United States
AU: Datta, R
EM: rupali.datta@utsa.edu
AF: Environmental Science, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio,
TX 78249, United States
AU: Sarkar, D
EM: dibyendu.sarkar@utsa.edu
AF: Environmental Science, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio,
TX 78249, United States
AU: Saminathan, S
EM: kmssumathi@yahoo.com
AF: Environmental Science, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio,
TX 78249, United States
AB:
Chelation of heavy metals is an important factor in enhancing metal solubility and, hence, metal availability to
plants to promote phytoremediation. In the present study, we compared the effects of application of a
biodegradable chelating agent, namely, ethylenediaminedisuccinic acid (EDDS) on enhancing plant available
form of lead (Pb) in Pb-based paint contaminated residential soils compared to that of a more commonly used,
but non-biodegradable chelate, i.e., ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Development of a successful
phytoremediation model for metals such as Pb depends on a thorough understanding of the physical and
chemical properties of the soil, along with the optimization of a chelate treatment to mobilize Pb from `unavailable'
pools to potentially plant available fraction. In this context, we set out to perform batch incubation experiments to
investigate the effectiveness of the two aforementioned chelates in enhancing plant available Pb at four different
concentrations (0, 5, 10 and 15 mM/kg soil) and three treatment durations (0, 10 and 30 days). We selected 12
contaminated residential soils from two major metropolitan areas (San Antonio, TX and Baltimore, MD) with
varying soil physico-chemical properties – the soils from San Antonio were primarily alkaline and those from
Baltimore were typically acidic. Total soil Pb concentrations ranged between 256 mg/kg and 4,182 mg/kg. Our
results show that both chelates increased the solubility of Pb, otherwise occluded in the complex soil matrix. For
both EDTA and EDDS, the exchangeable concentrations of soil Pb also increased with increase in chelate
concentration and incubation time. The most effective treatment was 15 mM chelate kg-1 soil incubated for 30
days, which caused many fold increase in potentially plant available Pb (a combination of the soluble and
exchangeable fractions) relative to the unamended controls. Step wise multiple linear regression analysis using
chelate-extractable Pb and soil properties showed that plant available Pb fraction could be assessed from the
two inter-related soil parameters: soil organic matter and soil pH. Although EDTA was more effective in Pb
solubilization than EDDS, the rapid kinetics of the Pb-EDTA complexation process and the prolonged persistence
of EDTA in soils pose a potential groundwater contamination problem via metal leaching. In contrast to EDTA,
EDDS addition caused relatively slow release of Pb from the soil matrix. The biodegradable nature (and short half
life) of EDDS in soils makes it a promising chelating agent for use as soil amendment to enhance Pb
solubilization and hence, potential plant uptake.
DE: 0432 Contaminant and organic biogeochemistry (0792)
DE: 0461 Metals
DE: 0496 Water quality
DE: 1852 Plant uptake
DE: 1865 Soils (0486)
SC: Biogeosciences [B]
MN: 2007 Fall Meeting