HR: 09:15h
AN: B31E-06 [Abstracts]
TI: A Cross-Site Evaluation of Alternative FPAR Products for Use in Diagnostic Carbon Flux Models
AU: * Turner, D P
EM: david.turner@oregonstate.edu
AF: College of Forestry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States
AU: Ritts, D
EM: david.ritts@oregonstate.edu
AF: College of Forestry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, United States
AU: Nightingale, J
EM: jnight@ltpmail.gsfc.nasa.gov
AF: Terrestrial Information Systems Branch, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt,
MD 20771, United States
AU: Wharton, S
EM: swharton@ucdavis.edu
AF: Atmospheric Science Group, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States
AU: Vickers, D
EM: vickers@coas.oregonstate.edu
AF: College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
97331, United States
AB:
Input requirements for diagnostic carbon flux models include estimates of FPAR (the fraction of incident
photosynthetically active radiation that is absorbed by the canopy). These estimates are available from a variety of
satellite-borne sensors, but in their raw form may contain significant artifacts associated primarily with clouds. In
this study we evaluated the sensitivity of simulated gross primary production (GPP), ecosystem respiration (Re),
and net ecosystem production (NEP) to alternative formulations of FPAR from the MODIS sensor. These
alternatives included the original product (FPARorig), a version based on filling and interpolation (FPARntsg), and
a version with a smoothing based on the TIMESAT algorithm (FPARts). Estimates of daily GPP, Re, and NEP
from multiple eddy covariance flux towers over multiple years were assembled as reference data. In almost all
cases, model output based on FPARntsg and FPARts reduced bias on an annual basis and RMSE for daily
values relative to model runs using FPARorig. At a wet conifer site, FPARts maintained the highest and most
consistent FPAR, a pattern consistent with the dense coniferous forest canopy there. Limitations of FPARts were
apparent at a grassland site with an abrupt fall off in greenness associated with onset of the dry season. Model
effectiveness in capturing the interannual variation in NEP was also enhanced in many cases with the adjusted
FPAR products.
DE: 0400 BIOGEOSCIENCES
DE: 0426 Biosphere/atmosphere interactions (0315)
DE: 0428 Carbon cycling (4806)
SC: Biogeosciences [B]
MN: 2007 Fall Meeting