HR: 09:30h
AN: B31E-07 [Abstracts]
TI: Global Variability of Light Use Efficiency: a Model Data Integration Approach
AU: * Tomelleri, E
EM: etomell@bgc-jena.mpg.de
AF: Max Planck Institut für Biogeochemie, Hans Knoell Str. 10, Jena, 07745, Germany
AU: Reichstein, M
EM: markus.reichstein@bgc-jena.mpg.de
AF: Max Planck Institut für Biogeochemie, Hans Knoell Str. 10, Jena, 07745, Germany
AU: Papale, D
EM: darpap@unitus.it
AF: Universitá della Tuscia - Laboratorio di Ecologia Forestale, Via S. Camillo de Lellis,
Viterbo, 01100, Italy
AU: Beer, C
EM: cbeer@bgc-jena.mpg.de
AF: Max Planck Institut für Biogeochemie, Hans Knoell Str. 10, Jena, 07745, Germany
AB:
Estimating the present global gross primary production (GPP) and giving reliable future predictions is one of the
major challenges of carbon cycle research. Light-use efficiency (LUE) algorithms are a potentially effective
approach for monitoring global primary production (GPP) using satellite-borne sensors such as the Moderate
Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). Their advantage is that all the drivers can be easily derived from
remote sensed data or from existing climate observation networks offering a number of opportunities for up-
scaling approaches. These algorithms are applied at relatively wide geographical areas, which may subsume
significant heterogeneity in vegetation LUEmax and, hence, introduce error. However, data on the variability
of the LUEmax coefficient, are scarce, often derived from leaf-level or NPP measurements and sometimes
conflicting. A solution to this problem is to estimate the this physiological parameter inverting the algorithm
against eddy covariance derived measurements of GPP, that are now globally available in a consistent format.
Hence, the objective of this study is to fill this gap by means of quantifying and compare the variability of
LUEmax and its sensitivity to environmental conditions among plant vegetation types. For this purpose, we
optimized the MOD17 algorithm against the GPP time series from the FLUXNET measurement network. In doing
this, we made a Bayesian data model synthesis by means of the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. The
LUEmax values from the BPLUT lookup table in the MOD17 user's manual were used as prior. The
uncertainties in flux data were characterized specifically site by site. The parameter estimation considerably
increased LUEmax for vegetation types with a short leaf-life while for evergreen vegetation types a posteriori
parameter values were lower than the a priori ones. These optimized a posteriori values open different research
questions regarding the uses of this model at wide geographical scale. In particular, while a classification in
plant functional types showed a biome dependent LUEmax variability, intra-vegetation variability is still
hampering upscaling approaches. This issue has to be addressed in our future research. Furthermore multiple-
constraint approaches considering water fluxes could contribute significantly to the reduction of uncertainties in
model estimates.
DE: 0428 Carbon cycling (4806)
DE: 0439 Ecosystems, structure and dynamics (4815)
DE: 0466 Modeling
SC: Biogeosciences [B]
MN: 2007 Fall Meeting