HR: 16:45h
AN: B54C-04 INVITED    [Abstracts]
TI: Paleozoic Hydrocarbon-Seep Limestones
AU: * Peckmann, J
EM: peckmann@uni-bremen.de
AF: Bremen University, DFG-Forschungszentrum Ozeanraender, Bremen, 28334, Germany
AB: To date, five Paleozoic hydrocarbon-seep limestones have been recognized based on carbonate fabrics, associated fauna, and stable carbon isotopes. These are the Middle Devonian Hollard Mound from the Antiatlas of Morocco [1], Late Devonian limestone lenses with the dimerelloid brachiopod Dzieduszyckia from the Western Meseta of Morocco [2], Middle Mississippian limestones with the dimerelloid brachiopod Ibergirhynchia from the Harz Mountains of Germany [3], Early Pennsylvanian limestones from the Tantes Mound in the High Pyrenees of France [4], and Late Pennsylvanian limestone lenses from the Ganigobis Shale Member of southern Namibia [5]. Among these examples, the composition of seepage fluids varied substantially as inferred from delta C-13 values of early diagenetic carbonate phases. Delta C-13 values as low as -50 per mil from the Tantes Mound and -51 per mil from the Ganigobis limestones reveal seepage of biogenic methane, whereas values of -12 per mil from limestones with Dzieduszyckia associated with abundant pyrobitumen agree with oil seepage. Intermediate delta C-13 values of carbonate cements from the Hollard Mound and Ibergirhynchia deposits probably reflect seepage of thermogenic methane. It is presently very difficult to assess the faunal evolution at seeps in the Paleozoic based on the limited number of examples. Two of the known seeps were typified by extremely abundant rhynchonellide brachiopods of the superfamily Dimerelloidea. Bivalve mollusks and tubeworms were abundant at two of the known Paleozoic seep sites; one was dominated by bivalve mollusks (Hollard Mound, Middle Devonian), another was dominated by tubeworms (Ganigobis Shale Member, Late Pennsylvanian). The tubeworms from these two deposits are interpreted to represent vestimentiferan worms, based on studies of the taphonomy of modern vestimentiferans. However, this interpretation is in conflict with the estimated evolutionary age of vestimentiferans based on molecular clock methods, which suggest a maximal age of 126 million years for this group. 1. Peckmann et al. (1999) Facies 40, 281. 2. Peckmann et al. (2007) Palaios 22, 114. 3. Peckmann et al. (2001) Geology 29, 271. 4. Buggisch and Krumm (2005) Facies 51, 566. 5. Himmler et al. (submitted) Palaeogeogr., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol.
DE: 0424 Biosignatures and proxies
DE: 0428 Carbon cycling (4806)
DE: 0439 Ecosystems, structure and dynamics (4815)
DE: 0448 Geomicrobiology
DE: 0456 Life in extreme environments
SC: Biogeosciences [B]
MN: 2007 Fall Meeting