HR: 16:00h
AN: DI24A-01 INVITED [Abstracts]
TI: New seismological attempts to study the top of the Earthfs core
AU: * Tanaka, S
EM: stan@jamstec.go.jp
AF: IFREE, JAMSTEC, 2-15 Natsushima-cho, Yokosuka, 237-0061, Japan
AB:
The seismological structure at the top of the Earthfs core has been masked by the D", the base of the mantle,
that is adjacent above the core. As increasing the high quality digital seismic data, the studies of the region have
been revisited.
First is the analysis of SmKS phases. Previously, the travel times of SKS, SKKS, and S3KS have been examined
by using a regional array or an old global network of which distribution was sparse. Now I show that a new data
set consisting of 1211 SmKS (m > 1) waveforms has been obtained from the recent permanent and temporary
networks that exist between 1990 and 2003. The new data has been analyzed to investigate the radial seismic
velocity structure around the core-mantle boundary (CMB). A stacked waveform at each distance bin coincides
with reflectivity synthetic one for PREM very well, whereas those for other global models (iasp91, ak135, and SP6)
yield disagreements. Furthermore, a waveform modeling for the D" structure results in a 30 km thick layer with a
10 percent S-wave velocity reduction at the mantle bottom as the best model while the SmKS modeling is
insensitive to the lowermost mantle structures with thickness of several hundred kilometers. The possibility of a
low P-wave velocity layer in the outermost core is remained because that the waveform fitness for the part of
S4KS is improved by further introducing a 140 km thick layer with a 0.8 percent P-wave velocity reduction at the
core top. However, a linear velocity gradient is assumed in the modeling of the outermost core. More complicated
structure, such as the change of the velocity gradient, would be suffered from the trade-off between the velocity
and the core radius.
As discussed above, an independent approach is required to investigate to the core radius and topography of the
CMB. Thus I have started another project. The combination of P4KP and PcP is suitable for canceling the
hypocenter uncertainty and the regional variations in the mantle and the crust. To date, I have obtained 94
P4KP|PcP times from the International Monitoring System (IMS) arrays, the J-array and IRIS stations. The times
of P4KP and PcP are carefully picked by hand. The picking points are similar to each other. The ray theoretical
travel times of PcP and P4KP-AB are calculated with PREM as a reference. The resultant residuals obtained are
scattered from +0 to +5 s. After correcting the travel times due to the ellipticity at the CMB for which the hydrostatic
equilibrium are considered, the corrected P4KP|PcP are distributed around 2|3 s. Correction with a global P
wave tomography yields a small change as large as 0.2 s. Therefore the P4KP|PcP residuals by 2 to 3 s should
be explained by excess core radius by 2 to 3 km comparing to those of PREM if the velocity structure obtained by
SmKS phases is adopted. Furthermore, scatterring of P4KP|PcP times are investigated by three CMB
topography models (Morelli and Dziewonski, 1987: MD, Dorrnbos and Hilton, 1989: DH, and Sze and van der
Hilst, 2003: SH). The correction using the DH model makes scattering of the P4KP|PcP residuals very small.
This suggests that the P4KP|PcP data is useful to image the CMB topography if we have an enough data.
Furthermore, a simultaneous inversion with SmKS would be important to elucidate the both side structures of the
CMB.
DE: 7200 SEISMOLOGY
DE: 7203 Body waves
DE: 7207 Core (1212, 1213, 8124)
SC: Study of the Earth's Deep Interior [DI]
MN: 2007 Fall Meeting