HR: 10:20h
AN: G42A-01    [Abstracts]
TI: GRACE-Based Estimates of GPS Satellite Antenna Phase Variations: Impact on Determining the Scale of the Terrestrial Reference Frame
AU: * Haines, B J
EM: Bruce.J.Haines@jpl.nasa.gov
AF: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Calif. Inst. of Tech., 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91109, United States
AU: Bar-Sever, Y E
EM: Yoaz.E.Bar-Sever@jpl.nasa.gov
AF: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Calif. Inst. of Tech., 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91109, United States
AU: Bertiger, W
EM: Willy.Bertiger@jpl.nasa.gov
AF: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Calif. Inst. of Tech., 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91109, United States
AU: Desai, S
EM: Shailen.Desai@jpl.nasa.gov
AF: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Calif. Inst. of Tech., 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91109, United States
AU: Owen, S
EM: Susan.Owen@jpl.nasa.gov
AF: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Calif. Inst. of Tech., 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91109, United States
AU: Sibois, A
EM: Aurore.E.Sibois@jpl.nasa.gov
AF: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Calif. Inst. of Tech., 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91109, United States
AU: Webb, F
EM: Frank.Webb@jpl.nasa.gov
AF: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Calif. Inst. of Tech., 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91109, United States
AB: Treating the GRACE tandem mission as an orbiting fiducial laboratory, we have developed new estimates of the phase and group-delay variations of the GPS transmitter antennas. Application of these antenna phase variation (APV) maps have shown great promise in reducing previously unexplained errors in our realization of GPS measurements from the TOPEX/POSEIDON (T/P; 1992--2005) and Jason-1 (2001--) missions. In particular, a 56 mm vertical offset in the solved-for position of the T/P receiver antenna is reduced to insignificance (less than 1 mm). For Jason-1, a spurious long-term (4-yr) drift in the daily antenna offset estimates is reduced from +3.7 to +0.1 mm/yr. Prior ground-based results, based on precise point positioning, also hint at the potential of the GRACE-based APV maps for scale determination, reducing the spurious scale rate by one half. In this paper, we report on the latest APV estimates from GRACE, and provide a further assessment of the impact of the APV maps on realizing the scale of the terrestrial reference frame (TRF) from GPS alone. To address this, we re-analyze over five years of data from a global (40+ station) ground network in a fiducial-free approach, using the new APV maps. A specialized multi-day GPS satellite orbit determination (OD) strategy is employed to better capitalize on dynamical constraints. The resulting estimates of TRF scale are compared to ITRF2005 in order to assess the quality of the solutions.
DE: 1225 Global change from geodesy (1222, 1622, 1630, 1641, 1645, 4556)
DE: 1229 Reference systems
DE: 1240 Satellite geodesy: results (6929, 7215, 7230, 7240)
DE: 1241 Satellite geodesy: technical issues (6994, 7969)
DE: 1294 Instruments and techniques
SC: Geodesy [G]
MN: 2007 Fall Meeting