HR: 0800h
AN: G51B-0436 [Abstracts]
TI: Satellite and Instrument Influences on ICESat Waveforms
AU: * Webb, C E
EM: webb@csr.utexas.edu
AF: Center for Space Research, University of Texas at Austin, 3925 W. Braker Lane, Suite 200,
Austin, TX 78759, United States
AU: Urban, T J
EM: urban@csr.utexas.edu
AF: Center for Space Research, University of Texas at Austin, 3925 W. Braker Lane, Suite 200,
Austin, TX 78759, United States
AU: Neuenschwander, A L
EM: amy@csr.utexas.edu
AF: Center for Space Research, University of Texas at Austin, 3925 W. Braker Lane, Suite 200,
Austin, TX 78759, United States
AU: Gutierrez, R
EM: oskar@csr.utexas.edu
AF: Center for Space Research, University of Texas at Austin, 3925 W. Braker Lane, Suite 200,
Austin, TX 78759, United States
AU: Schutz, B E
EM: schutz@csr.utexas.edu
AF: Center for Space Research, University of Texas at Austin, 3925 W. Braker Lane, Suite 200,
Austin, TX 78759, United States
AB:
The White Sands Space Harbor (WSSH) has served as the principal ground calibration site throughout the Ice,
Cloud and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) mission. The Center for Space Research (CSR) at the University of
Texas at Austin continues to conduct various experiments designed to validate the timing, geolocation and
geometric characteristics of individual laser footprints on the surface. In addition, two airborne lidar surveys of the
calibration site and surrounding area were conducted during the mission, first in 2003 and again in 2007.
Chosen for its limited surface roughness and topographic flatness, this area has been targeted 3-4 times in each
of the 12 ICESat mapping campaigns to date, yielding a significant altimetry data set. The derived surface
elevations are compared with those from the airborne lidar surveys, as well as those obtained by the Shuttle
Radar Topography Mission (SRTM). Furthermore, the Geoscience Laser Altimetry System (GLAS) onboard ICESat
records a digitized waveform for each laser pulse returned from the surface. The two methods currently used to fit
such signals in ICESat data processing are examined and compared for the WSSH waveforms. The first fits up
to two distinct Gaussians and provides a surface elevation at the location of the maximum peak. The second fits
up to six overlapping Gaussians and provides a surface elevation at the centroid of the pulse. Observed
differences in the reported elevations are discussed in terms of the satellite's off-nadir
targeting geometry, the laser energy, and the skewness of the returned waveforms.
DE: 1241 Satellite geodesy: technical issues (6994, 7969)
DE: 1243 Space geodetic surveys
DE: 1294 Instruments and techniques
SC: Geodesy [G]
MN: 2007 Fall Meeting