HR: 08:45h
AN: H11G-03 [Abstracts]
TI: Characterization of Watershed Model Behavior and Sensitivity-Guided Parameter Estimation Across a Hydroclimatic Gradient
AU: * van Werkhoven, K
EM: klg292@psu.edu
AF: Pennsylvania State University, 212 Sackett Building, University Park, PA 16802, United
States
AU: Wagener, T
EM: thorsten@engr.psu.edu
AF: Pennsylvania State University, 212 Sackett Building, University Park, PA 16802, United
States
AU: Reed, P
EM: preed@engr.psu.edu
AF: Pennsylvania State University, 212 Sackett Building, University Park, PA 16802, United
States
AU: Tang, Y
EM: yxt132@psu.edu
AF: Pennsylvania State University, 212 Sackett Building, University Park, PA 16802, United
States
AB:
A fundamental tradeoff exists in watershed modeling between a model's flexibility for representing a range of
watersheds with varying characteristics versus its potential for over-parameterization. This study uses global
sensitivity analysis and multiobjective optimization to evaluate how a medium-complexity model, the Sacramento
Soil Moisture Accounting Model (SAC-SMA), represents a wide range of watersheds with varying physical and
hydroclimatic characteristics. Initially, Sobol's sensitivity analysis has been used to evaluate SAC-SMA's behavior
in twelve Model Parameter Estimation Experiment (MOPEX) watersheds in the US. The watersheds span a wide
hydroclimatic gradient from arid to humid systems. Four evaluation metrics reflecting base flows, mid-range
flows, peak flows, and long-term water balance were used to comprehensively characterize trends in sensitivity
and model behavior. Results show significant variation in parameter sensitivities that are strongly correlated to
the hydroclimatic characteristics of the MOPEX watersheds. The sensitivity patterns are consistent with the
expected dominant processes in each case and demonstrate the need for moderate model complexity to
adequately represent different hydroclimatic regimes. As a final step, the parameter sensitivities have been used
to guide an adaptive multiobjective calibration framework and assess the impacts of reducing parameterization
requirements for each of the MOPEX watersheds.
DE: 1846 Model calibration (3333)
DE: 1847 Modeling
DE: 1879 Watershed
SC: Hydrology [H]
MN: 2007 Fall Meeting