HR: 0800h
AN: H21C-0706    [Abstracts]
TI: A NEW SATURATED ZONE SITE-SCALE FLOW MODEL FOR YUCCA MOUNTAIN
AU: * eddebbarh, a
EM: aeddebba@lanl.gov
AF: los alamos national laboratory, MS T003, los alamos, nm 87545,
AU: james, s c
EM: scjames@sandia.gov
AF: Sandia National Laboratories, p.o.Box 969 MS 9409, livermore, CA 94551,
AU: doherty, j
EM: jdoherty@gil.com.au
AF: Watermark Numerical Computing, 336 Cliveden Avenue, Corinda, Aus 4075,
AU: zyvoloski, g
EM: gaz@lanl.gov
AF: los alamos national laboratory, MS T003, los alamos, nm 87545,
AU: arnold, b w
EM: bwarnol@sandia.gov
AF: Sandia National Laboratories, p.o.Box 969 MS 9409, livermore, CA 94551,
AB: A saturated zone site scale flow model was developed for Yucca Mountain, Nevada, to incorporate new data and analyses including new stratigraphic and water level data from Nye County wells, single and multiple well hydraulic testing data, and new hydrochemistry data. New analyses include use of data from the 2004 transient Death Valley Regional (ground water) Flow System (DVRFS) model, the 2003 unsaturated zone flow model, and the latest hydrogeologic framework model (HFM). This model includes: (1) the latest understanding of SZ flow, (2) enhanced model validation and uncertainty analyses, (3) improved locations and definitions of fault zones, (4) refined grid resolution (500 to 250 m grid spacing), and (5) use of new data. The flow model was completed using the three dimensional, finite element heat and mass transfer computer code, FEHM V2.24. The SZ site scale flow model was calibrated with the commercial parameter estimation code, PEST to achieve a minimum difference between observed water levels and predicted water levels, and also between volumetric/mass flow rates along specific boundary segments as supplied by the DVRFS. 161 water level and head measurements with varied weights were used for calibration. A comparison between measured water level data and the potentiometric surface yielded an RMSE of 20.7 m (weighted RMSE of 8.8 m). The calibrated model was used to evaluate the impact of alternative models on flow paths and specific discharge predictions. Model confidence was built by comparing: (1) calculated to observed hydraulic heads, and (2) calibrated to measured permeabilities (and therefore specific discharge). In addition, flowpaths emanating from below the repository footprint are consistent with those inferred both from gradients of measured head and from independent water chemistry data. Uncertainties in the SZ site scale flow model were quantified because all uncertainty contributes to inaccuracy in system representation and response. Null space and solution space uncertainties were determined.
DE: 1829 Groundwater hydrology
SC: Hydrology [H]
MN: 2007 Fall Meeting