HR: 0800h
AN: H31H-0763 [Abstracts]
TI: A Bayesian Uncertainty Framework for Conceptual Snowmelt and Hydrologic Models Applied to the Tenderfoot Creek Experimental Forest
AU: * Smith, T
EM: tylersmith@montana.edu
AF: Montana State University, 334 Leon Johnson Hall
P.O. Box 173120, Bozeman, MT 59717, United States
AU: Marshall, L
EM: lmarshall@montana.edu
AF: Montana State University, 334 Leon Johnson Hall
P.O. Box 173120, Bozeman, MT 59717, United States
AB:
In many mountainous regions, the single most important parameter in forecasting the controls on regional water
resources is snowpack (Williams et al., 1999). In an effort to bridge the gap between theoretical understanding
and functional modeling of snow-driven watersheds, a flexible hydrologic modeling framework is being
developed. The aim is to create a suite of models that move from parsimonious structures, concentrated on
aggregated watershed response, to those focused on representing finer scale processes and distributed
response. This framework will operate as a tool to investigate the link between hydrologic model predictive
performance, uncertainty, model complexity, and observable hydrologic processes.
Bayesian methods, and particularly Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques, are extremely useful in
uncertainty assessment and parameter estimation of hydrologic models. However, these methods have some
difficulties in implementation. In a traditional Bayesian setting, it can be difficult to reconcile multiple data types,
particularly those offering different spatial and temporal coverage, depending on the model type. These difficulties
are also exacerbated by sensitivity of MCMC algorithms to model initialization and complex parameter
interdependencies.
As a way of circumnavigating some of the computational complications, adaptive MCMC algorithms have been
developed to take advantage of the information gained from each successive iteration. Two adaptive algorithms
are compared is this study, the Adaptive Metropolis (AM) algorithm, developed by Haario et al (2001), and the
Delayed Rejection Adaptive Metropolis (DRAM) algorithm, developed by Haario et al (2006). While neither
algorithm is truly Markovian, it has been proven that each satisfies the desired ergodicity and stationarity
properties of Markov chains.
Both algorithms were implemented as the uncertainty and parameter estimation framework for a conceptual
rainfall-runoff model based on the Probability Distributed Model (PDM), developed by Moore (1985). We
implement the modeling framework in Stringer Creek watershed in the Tenderfoot Creek Experimental Forest
(TCEF), Montana. The snowmelt-driven watershed offers that additional challenge of modeling snow
accumulation and melt and current efforts are aimed at developing a temperature- and radiation-index snowmelt
model.
Auxiliary data available from within TCEF's watersheds are used to support in the understanding of information
value as it relates to predictive performance. Because the model is based on lumped parameters, auxiliary data
are hard to incorporate directly. However, these additional data offer benefits through the ability to inform prior
distributions of the lumped, model parameters. By incorporating data offering different information into the
uncertainty assessment process, a cross-validation technique is engaged to better ensure that modeled results
reflect real process complexity.
DE: 1846 Model calibration (3333)
DE: 1847 Modeling
DE: 1863 Snow and ice (0736, 0738, 0776, 1827)
SC: Hydrology [H]
MN: 2007 Fall Meeting