HR: 11:20h
AN: MR32A-05 INVITED [Abstracts]
TI: Important yet Overlooked Topological Mechanisms of Compression in Silicate Liquids at Low Pressure (0-5 GPa).
AU: * Lange, R A
EM: becky@umich.edu
AF: University of Michigan, Dept. of Geological Sciences
1100 N. University Ave., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1005, United States
AB:
The compressibility of silicate liquids has long been known to be larger than corresponding solids (especially
pronounced at low pressures; 0-5 GPa), with important consequences for the increase in the density difference
between partial melts vs. crystalline mantle with decreasing pressure, which in turn has consequences for
decompressional mantle melting and an increased buoyancy drive for partial melts. Despite the importance of
the enhanced compressibility of liquids relative to solids at low pressures, its cause has often been overlooked.
Instead, most of the focus on understanding the structural mechanisms of liquid compressibility has been limited
to Al3+ and Si4+ coordination change. Here, a discussion of the importance of topological
mechanisms of compression (and expansion) in liquids at low pressure is presented.
The principal mechanisms of compression for minerals (also available to liquids) involve changes in either
bond lengths or T-O-T bond angles. Minerals may also undergo an abrupt phase transition (usually first-order) to
a higher-density structure with pressure, which corresponds either to an abrupt change in topology (e.g., quartz to
coesite) and/or cation coordination (e.g., coesite to stishovite), both of which can induce large changes in density.
In contrast, liquids may undergo continuous and gradual changes in topology (network connectivity) and/or
cation coordination, which requires bonds to be broken and reformed and thus reflects the dynamic character of
liquids in contrast to solids. Thus, not only changes in cation coordination, but also changes in topology is a
mechanism of compression uniquely available to liquids.
The magnitude of these topological mechanisms of compression can be seen by comparing the
compressibility of liquid KAlSi3O8 to that of sanidine as a function of pressure. At one bar, the
compressibility of liquid KAlSi3O8 is 264% larger than that of its crystalline equivalent; this difference
diminishes to a 19% difference by 6.5 GPa. There is little evidence for coordination change of either Al3+ or
Si4+ in KAlSi3O8 liquid at low pressure, so that the enhanced liquid compressibility clearly
involves topological mechanisms (e.g., changing from a tridymite to a feldspar topology) rather than one based
on Si/Al coordination change. This mechanism of compression rapidly increases with decreasing pressure and
facilitates the large density difference between liquid and crystal at one bar. Another example of the importance of
topological mechanisms of compression (and expansion) in liquids is seen with the volume of fusion (18%) of
diopside at one bar. The 18% increase in liquid volume cannot be explained by a change in Si4+
coordination number or by mechanisms available to crystalline diopside. In fact, crystalline diopside would have
to be heated by more than 2000 degrees above the one-bar melting temperature in order to increase its volume
by 18%. Thus, the only plausible explanation for the large volume of fusion is a change in average topology (e.g.,
from a pyroxene to a pyroxenoid topology). As liquid CaMgSi2O6 is then compressed with increasing
pressure, a wide range of denser topologies, including one similar to pyroxene, can be accessed; this
mechanism contributes substantially to the compressibility of liquid CaMgSi2O6 at low pressure.
Other examples and the consequences for the efficient extraction of oceanic and continental crust out of the
uppermost mantle will be given.
DE: 1037 Magma genesis and partial melting (3619)
DE: 3640 Igneous petrology
DE: 3919 Equations of state
DE: 3924 High-pressure behavior
DE: 3929 NMR, Mossbauer spectroscopy, and other magnetic techniques
SC: Mineral and Rock Physics [MR]
MN: 2007 Fall Meeting