HR: 13:55h
AN: S23C-02 INVITED    [Abstracts]
TI: Probabilistic seismic hazard in the San Francisco Bay area based on a simplified viscoelastic-cycle model of fault interactions
AU: * Pollitz, F F
EM: fpollitz@usgs.gov
AF: US Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Rd., MS 977, Menlo Park, CA 94025, United States
AU: Schwartz, D P
EM: dschwartz@usgs.gov
AF: US Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Rd., MS 977, Menlo Park, CA 94025, United States
AB: We construct a viscoelastic-cycle model of plate boundary deformation that includes the effect of time-dependent interseismic strain accumulation, coseismic strain release, and viscoelastic relaxation of the substrate beneath the seismogenic crust. For a given fault system, time-averaged stress changes at any point (not on a fault) are constrained to zero, i.e., kinematic consistency is enforced for the fault system. The dates of last rupture, mean recurrence times, and the slip distributions of the (assumed) repeating ruptures are key inputs into the viscoelastic cycle model. This simple formulation allows construction of stress evolution at all points in the plate boundary zone for purposes of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA). Stress evolution is combined with a Coulomb failure stress threshold at representative points on the fault segments to estimate the times of their respective future ruptures. In our PSHA we consider uncertainties in a four-dimensional parameter space: the rupture peridocities, slip distributions, time of last earthquake (for pre-historic ruptures) and Coulomb failure stress thresholds. We apply this methodology to the San Francisco Bay region using a recently-determined fault chronology of area faults. Assuming single-segment rupture scenarios, we find that future rupture probabilities of area faults in the coming decades are the highest for the southern Hayward, Rodgers Creek, and northern Calaveras faults. This conclusion is qualitatively similar to that of Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities [2003], but the probabilities derived here are significantly higher. Given that fault rupture probabilities are highly model dependent, no single model should be used to assess to time-dependent rupture probabilities. We suggest that several models, including the present one, be used in a comprehensive PSHA methodology, as was done in Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities [2003].
DE: 1242 Seismic cycle related deformations (6924, 7209, 7223, 7230)
DE: 7223 Earthquake interaction, forecasting, and prediction (1217, 1242)
SC: Seismology [S]
MN: 2007 Fall Meeting