HR: 09:00h
AN: S31E-05    [Abstracts]
TI: Can we go From Tomographically Determined Seismic Velocities to Composition? Amplitude Resolution Issues in Local Earthquake Tomography
AU: * Wagner, L
EM: wagner@dtm.ciw.edu
AF: Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5241 Broad Branch Rd NW, Washington, DC 20015, United States
AB: There have been a number of recent papers (i.e. Lee (2003), James et al. (2004), Hacker and Abers (2004), Schutt and Lesher (2006)) which calculate predicted velocities for xenolith compositions at mantle pressures and temperatures. It is tempting, therefore, to attempt to go the other way ... to use tomographically determined absolute velocities to constrain mantle composition. However, in order to do this, it is vital that one is able to accurately constrain not only the polarity of the determined velocity deviations (i.e. fast vs slow) but also how much faster, how much slower relative to the starting model, if absolute velocities are to be so closely analyzed. While much attention has been given to issues concerning spatial resolution in seismic tomography (i.e. what areas are fast, what areas are slow), little attention has been directed at the issue of amplitude resolution (how fast, how slow). Velocity deviation amplitudes in seismic tomography are heavily influenced by the amount of regularization used and the number of iterations performed. Determining these two parameters is a difficult and little discussed problem. I explore the effect of these two parameters on the amplitudes obtained from the tomographic inversion of the Chile Argentina Geophysical Experiment (CHARGE) dataset, and attempt to determine a reasonable solution space for the low Vp, high Vs, low Vp/Vs anomaly found above the flat slab in central Chile. I then compare this solution space to the range in experimentally determined velocities for peridotite end-members to evaluate our ability to constrain composition using tomographically determined seismic velocities. I find that in general, it will be difficult to constrain the compositions of normal mantle peridotites using tomographically determined velocities, but that in the unusual case of the anomaly above the flat slab, the observed velocity structure still has an anomalously high S wave velocity and low Vp/Vs ratio that is most consistent with enstatite, but inconsistent with the predicted velocities of known mantle xenoliths.
DE: 3909 Elasticity and anelasticity
DE: 7208 Mantle (1212, 1213, 8124)
DE: 7240 Subduction zones (1207, 1219, 1240)
DE: 7270 Tomography (6982, 8180)
SC: Seismology [S]
MN: 2007 Fall Meeting