HR: 0800h
AN: S51A-0210 [Abstracts]
TI: Quantifying and Qualifying USGS ShakeMap Uncertainty
AU: * Quitoriano, V
EM: vinceq@usgs.gov
AF: U.S. Geological Survey, P.O. Box 25046 MS-966, Denver, CO 80225,
AU: Wald, D J
EM: wald@usgs.gov
AF: U.S. Geological Survey, P.O. Box 25046 MS-966, Denver, CO 80225,
AU: Lin, K
EM: klin@usgs.gov
AF: U.S. Geological Survey, P.O. Box 25046 MS-966, Denver, CO 80225,
AB:
We describe newly-developed algorithms for quantifying and qualifying uncertainties associated with USGS
ShakeMap ground motions. We calculate an uncertainty measure as a function of location on the map dependent
on the underlying ground motion prediction equation. Uncertainty is high for larger magnitude earthquakes when
finiteness is not yet constrained (and hence the rupture distance is also uncertain); uncertainty at each grid cell is
decreased by the proximity of seismic stations. This grid-based "uncertainty map" is essential for probabilistically
evaluating the losses that derive from hazard modeling based on ShakeMaps. However, many users may prefer a
qualitative grade for the entire ShakeMap. This grading scale will allow them to quickly gauge the appropriate
level of confidence when using rapidly produced ShakeMaps as part of the post-earthquake critical decision-
making process. To this end, we describe a new uncertainty letter grading ("A" through "F") based on the
uncertainty map. The letter grades are calculated from the mean uncertainty over the map area at grid cells that
have intensities of VI or greater. This constraint focuses the calculation of uncertainty only on portions of the map
with potentially damaging ground motions (inclusion of lower intensities would also make the average uncertainty
dependent on map scaling.) A middle range ("C") grade corresponds to a ShakeMap for a moderate magnitude
earthquake modeled with a point source. Lower grades "D" and
"F" are assigned for larger events (M>6) where finite source
dimensions are not constrained. The addition of ground motion observations (or observed macroseismic
intensities) to constrain ground motions has the opposite effect, reducing uncertainties over data-constrained
portions of the map. Higher grades ("A" and "B") correspond to ShakeMaps with constrained fault dimension and
numerous stations, depending on the density of station/data coverage. Thus the letter grade changes with
subsequent ShakeMap revisions as more data are added or when finite-faulting dimensions are established.
UR: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/shakemap/
DE: 7212 Earthquake ground motions and engineering seismology
SC: Seismology [S]
MN: 2007 Fall Meeting