HR: 1340h
AN: T13D-1580 [Abstracts]
TI: Neoproterozoic Mafic Magmatism in Central Novaya Zemlya, Additional Evidence From Zircon and Titanite U-Pb Ages
AU: * Corfu, F
EM: fernando.corfu@geo.uio.no
AF: Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, P.O.Box 1047 Blindern, Oslo, 0316,
Norway
AU: Svensen, H
EM: henrik.svensen@matnat.uio.no
AF: PGP, University of Oslo, P.O.Box 1048 Blindern, Oslo, 0316, Norway
AU: Planke, S
EM: planke@vbpr.no
AF: Volcanic Basin Petroleum Research, Oslo Innovation Park, Oslo, 0349, Norway
AU: Nakrem, H
EM: h.a.nakrem@nhm.uio.no
AF: Natural History Museum, PO Box 1172 Blindern, Oslo, 0318, Norway
AB:
Novaya Zemlya is a banana-shaped set of islands stretching northward from the Polar Urals and separating the
Barents and Kara Seas. The southernmost part of the islands is an integral component of the Timanides, a
Neoproterozoic orogenic belt, which broadly follows the Urals along the eastern and northeastern margin of
Baltica. The Timanian event at ca. 600-550 Ma created a folded and imbricated Late-Neoproterozoic basement,
which was subsequently unconformably covered by a succession of Early Ordovician to Permian sediments. In
more northerly parts of Novaya Zemlya the evidence for such an Early Paleozoic unconformity seems to dissipate,
the geological picture being dominated by an apparently continuous sedimentary succession spanning most of
the Paleozoic. There is, however, local evidence for the presence of a Precambrian basement comprising Late
Neoproterozoic magmatic rocks and perhaps also Mesoproterozoic basement (Korago et al. 2004). In our study
we have now obtained further evidence for Neoproterozoic plutonic activity in the region.
Zircons were analyzed by ID-TIMS in four gabbroic and dioritic dikes from Matotchkin Strait and Mashigin Fjord in
central parts of Novaya Zemlya. They yield U-Pb ages ranging from 716 to 704 Ma, which based on the uniform
and characteristic morphology of the zircon populations and the similar titanite age from one sample can be
interpreted as dating intrusion of the mafic magmas. These ages indicate a period of magmatism that predated
Timanian convergence and collision, perhaps supporting the inference that central parts of Novaya Zemlya were
not affected by the Timanian orogeny. The timing of these plutonic events at 716-704 Ma corresponds instead to
that of arc magmatism on parts of the Siberian margin (e.g. Vernikovsky et al. 2003) pointing to a possible
paleogeographic affiliation of these domains.
References
Korago, E.A., Kovaleva, G.N., Lopation, B.G. & Orgo,V.V. 2004. The Precambrian rocks of Novaya Zemlya. In Gee,
D,G, & Pease, V.L. (eds.) The Neoproterozoic Timanide Orogen of Eastern Baltica. Geol. Soc. London Memoirs,
30, 135-143.
Vernikovsky, V.A., Vernikovskayaa, A.E., Kotov, A.B., Sal'nikova, E.B., & Kovach, V.P. 2003. Neoproterozoic
accretionary and collisional events on western margin of the Siberian craton: new geological and
geochronological evidence from the Yenisey Ridge. Tectonophysics 375, 147– 168.
DE: 1100 GEOCHRONOLOGY
DE: 8178 Tectonics and magmatism
DE: 9315 Arctic region (0718, 4207)
DE: 9622 Proterozoic
SC: Tectonophysics [T]
MN: 2007 Fall Meeting