HR: 1340h
AN: T13D-1582    [Abstracts]
TI: SCANLIPS – A Study of Epirogenic Uplift of Scandinavia
AU: England, R W
EM: rwe5@le.ac.uk
AF: University of Leicester, Department of Geology University Rd, Leiecster, LE1 7RH, United Kingdom
AU: * Ebbing, J
EM: joerg.ebbing@ngu.no
AF: Norwegian Geological Survey, Liev Eirikssons vei 39, Trondheim, NO-7491, Norway
AB: Thermochronology data and geomorphological interpretation indicate that parts of the Scandinavian mountains have risen by over 1 km since the Miocene. This permanent uplift, the cause of which is still disputed, varies across Norway, being greatest in southern and northern areas and least in the central region. To investigate this the SCANLIPS project employs passive seismology, coupled with modelling of potential field data to determine variations in crustal properties and structure across Norway and Sweden. Initially we intend to test whether lateral variations in crustal structure and properties are correlated with the uplift pattern. This would suggest that the cause of the differential uplift lies in a modification of the crust. If the test of this hypothesis is null we will use the data to investigate the present day upper mantle structure for the cause. Between April and October 2006 28 seismometers were deployed at sites along a c. 600 km long profile between Trondheim in Norway and Harnosand in Sweden to record teleseismic arrivals. Receiver Functions have been calculated for teleseismic events recorded at these stations and then modelled to determine crustal velocity structure, estimate Vp/Vs and depth to Moho. Preliminary results suggest that crustal thickness increases eastward beneath Norway and then remains deep beneath the lower topography of central Sweden. Along the profile a gradual eastward increase in seismic velocity, including a very high velocity lower crust beneath Sweden explains the compensation of shallow topography by thick crust. Forward density and isostatic modelling shows that the introduction of the high-density lower crust adjusts both the gravity field and the isostatic compensation. Beneath Norway the crust thins rapidly toward the continental margin at a rate that is faster than the topography decreases. This suggests that at least part of the topography is supported by the flexural strength of the crust in the footwall of the More-Trondelag fault zone. Recently published results of Svenningsen et al. (2007) show a similar thickening below the high topography of southern Norway, indicating Airy type compensation. Further work is required before a direct comparison can be made of the crustal properties between the two regions and a possible cause for the differential uplift of Scandinavia determined.
UR: http://www.le.ac.uk/gl/rwe5/Neogene_uplift.html
DE: 1219 Gravity anomalies and Earth structure (0920, 7205, 7240)
DE: 7205 Continental crust (1219)
DE: 8038 Regional crustal structure
DE: 8110 Continental tectonics: general (0905)
DE: 8138 Lithospheric flexure
SC: Tectonophysics [T]
MN: 2007 Fall Meeting