HR: 1340h
AN: T23C-1546 [Abstracts]
TI: Pieces of Laurentia in East Antarctica
AU: * Goodge, J W
EM: jgoodge@d.umn.edu
AF: University of Minnesota-Duluth, Department of Geological Sciences, Duluth, MN 55812,
United States
AU: Vervoort, J D
EM: vervoort@wsu.edu
AF: Washington State University, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Pullman, WA
99164, United States
AU: Brecke, D M
EM: brec0058@d.umn.edu
AF: University of Minnesota-Duluth, Department of Geological Sciences, Duluth, MN 55812,
United States
AU: Fanning, C M
EM: Mark.Fanning@anu.edu.au
AF: Australian National University, Research School of Earth Sciences, Canberra, ACT 0200,
Australia
AU: Williams, I S
EM: Ian.Williams@anu.edu.au
AF: Australian National University, Research School of Earth Sciences, Canberra, ACT 0200,
Australia
AU: Myrow, P
EM: pmyrow@coloradocollege.edu
AF: Colorado College, Department of Geology, Colorado Springs, CO 80903, Australia
AU: DuFrane, S A
EM: dufrane@wsu.edu
AF: Washington State University, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Pullman, WA
99164, United States
AB:
East Antarctica figures prominently as a central cratonic piece in reconstructions of the Neoproterozoic
supercontinent Rodinia, yet these fits variously position East Antarctica next to (so-called SWEAT fit), or distant
from, the western margin of Laurentia. Paleomagnetic poles are lacking for East Antarctica during the time period
between assembly at about 1.3-1.1 Ga and subsequent breakup by 700-650 Ma, and there is uncertainty about
the reliability and/or applicability of data from Laurentia and Australia. Despite controversial paleomagnetic
results, several lines of geologic, age and isotopic evidence from the central Transantarctic Mountains provide a
reasonable Rodinia fit between East Antarctica and western Laurentia: (1) similar Nd-isotope crustal age
provinces; (2) similarity of ~1.7 Ga crustal events; (3) provenance link between ~1.4 Ga detrital zircons in Antarctic
rift-margin strata and Mesoproterozoic A-type granites in Laurentia; (4) associated 1.8-1.6 Ga detrital zircons in
these same strata; and (5) similarity in ages of rift-margin formation, by 668 Ma in East Antarctica and ~717-685
Ma in western Laurentia. New isotopic and age data further support such a fit: (6) ~1.4 Ga Antarctic-margin detrital
zircons have εHf(i) values (-2 to +7) that match those of coeval A-type Laurentian granites; and (7) a
newly discovered A-type rapakivi granite boulder in glacial till at Nimrod Glacier has a U-Pb zircon age of ~1440
Ma and εHf(i) = +7, indicating the presence of Mesoproterozoic granites beneath the East Antarctic ice
sheet. We suggest that these detrital-mineral and rock clasts represent distinctive pieces of Laurentia in East
Antarctica, providing further support for a Rodinia connection. These two areas thus share similar crustal, rift-
margin, and sedimentary histories, and there are several lines of lithologic correlation strengthened by distinctive
age and isotopic signatures. From these integrated geological, isotopic and geochronological datasets we also
infer that some significant part of the East Antarctic shield is comprised by Paleoproterozoic orogenic belts
punctuated with geochemically and temporally distinctive ~1.4 Ga A-type rapikivi granites. Although various other
Rodinia geometries have been suggested, none appear as geologically compelling as the modified SWEAT
model.
DE: 1040 Radiogenic isotope geochemistry
DE: 1115 Radioisotope geochronology
DE: 8103 Continental cratons
DE: 8157 Plate motions: past (3040)
DE: 9310 Antarctica (4207)
SC: Tectonophysics [T]
MN: 2007 Fall Meeting