HR: 16:15h
AN: T34C-02 INVITED [Abstracts]
TI: Is rapid exhumation of the High Himalaya driven by ramp overthrusting, the formation of mid- crustal duplex, or out-of-sequence thrusting associated with channel flow?
AU: Herman, F
EM: frederic@erdw.ethz.ch
AF: California Institute of Technology, Tectonics Observatory, Pasadena, CA 91125, United
States
AU: * Avouac, J
EM: avouac@gps.caltech.edu
AF: California Institute of Technology, Tectonics Observatory, Pasadena, CA 91125, United
States
AU: Bollinger, L
EM: laurent.bollinger@cea.fr
AF: Laboratorie de Detection et de Geophysique, CEA, Bruyeres-le-Chatel, 91680, France
AU: Maheo, G
EM: gweltaz.maheo@univ-lyon1.fr
AF: California Institute of Technology, Tectonics Observatory, Pasadena, CA 91125, United
States
AU: Farley, K
EM: farley@gps.caltech.edu
AF: California Institute of Technology, Tectonics Observatory, Pasadena, CA 91125, United
States
AU: Harrison, M
EM: tmh@oro.ess.ucla.edu
AF: University of California, Los Angeles, 595 Charles Young Drive East, Los Angeles, CA
90095, United States
AB:
A number of studies of river incision and exhumation across the Nepal Himalaya indicate that uplift rates must
increase abruptly from the Lesser Himalaya to the High Himalaya. Locally high uplift rates could relate to: 1-
thrusting over a mid-crustal ramp; 2- mid-crustal duplex growth; or 3- out-of-sequence thrusting along the front of
the High Himalaya. Ramp-overthrusting can be a viable mechanism only over a short period of time since,
considered alone, this mechanism fails to account for the growth of the orogenic wedge. The same problem
arises with out-of-sequence thrusting, if considered alone. Thus an additional mechanism is needed to account
for the transfer of material from the Indian crust to the Himalayan wedge. The structure of the Himalayan wedge
as well as the pattern of active deformation across the range suggests that underplating, through the
development of a duplex system at mid-crustal depth, has been the dominant mechanism of accretion over the
last ~15Myr. In an attempt at determining plausible kinematic models over this period, we have applied a
formal inverse approach based on the Neighbourhood Algorithm. The forward models consider the possibility of
either thrusting localized along a single major thrust fault (the MHT) with non-uniform underplating due to
duplexing, or out-of sequence thrusting in addition to thrusting along the MHT and with uniform underplating rate.
The models are computed using a thermokinematic FEM model (PECUBE), and tested against
thermochronological, thermometric and thermobarometric data from central Nepal compiled from the literature
and complemented with new (U-Th)/He data. The formal inversion approach allows definition of best fitting
values of model parameters and their uncertainties. In addition to the geometric parameters, model variables
include overthrusting rates; radiogenic heat production in the High Himalayan Crystalline (HHC) sequence; the
timing of enhanced rock uplift /exhumation rates corresponding to the formation of the duplex or out-of-sequence
thrust re-activation. A model with out-of-sequence thrusting can provide a satisfactory fit to the data (with a
minimum reduced χ2 of 1.41) but requires a large overthrusting rate of 11 +- 1mm/yr and implies a total
convergence rate >30 mm/yr. The duplex model, with a minimum reduced χ2 of 1.01, is more
consistent with observation. According to this model, the 20 mm/yr convergence results from an overthrusting rate
of 5 +- 1 mm/yr and an underthrusting rate of 15 +- 1 mm/yr. Modern uplift rates are estimated to increase from
about 0.8+-0.2 mm/yr in the Lesser Himalaya to 3.5 +- 0.5 mm/yr at the front of the high range, 95 +- 5 km from the
MFT. The effective friction coefficient is estimated to be 0.09 +- 0.01 and the radiogenic heat production of HHC
units is estimated 2.2 +- 0.1 μW/m3. The mid-crustal duplex initiated at 10 +-2 Ma, leading to an
increase of uplift rate at front of the High Himalaya from ~0.8 to 3.5 mm/yr. Thus the analyzed dataset
appears more consistent with a duplex model relative to out-of-sequence-thrusting. Given the excellent fit of the
duplex model to the geologic, petrologic and geophysical constraints, there appears little basis to support a
channel flow-type model in a Himalayan context over the last 15Myr.
DE: 1140 Thermochronology
DE: 8102 Continental contractional orogenic belts and inversion tectonics
SC: Tectonophysics [T]
MN: 2007 Fall Meeting