HR: 1340h
AN: U43B-1133 [Abstracts]
TI: Beyond multi-fractals: surrogate time series and fields
AU: * Venema, V
EM: Victor.Venema@uni-bonn.de
AF: University of Bonn
Meteorological institute, Auf dem Huegel 20, Bonn, 53115, Germany
AU: Simmer, C
EM: csimmer@uni-bonn.de
AF: University of Bonn
Meteorological institute, Auf dem Huegel 20, Bonn, 53115, Germany
AB:
Most natural complex are characterised by variability on a large range of temporal and spatial scales. The two
main methodologies to generate such structures are Fourier/FARIMA based algorithms and multifractal methods.
The former is restricted to Gaussian data, whereas the latter requires the structure to be self-similar. This work
will present so-called surrogate data as an alternative that works with any (empirical) distribution and power
spectrum. The best-known surrogate algorithm is the iterative amplitude adjusted Fourier transform (IAAFT)
algorithm.
We have studied six different geophysical time series (two clouds, runoff of a small and a large river, temperature
and rain) and their surrogates. The power spectra and consequently the 2nd order structure functions were
replicated accurately. Even the fourth order structure function was more accurately reproduced by the surrogates
as would be possible by a fractal method, because the measured structure deviated too strong from fractal
scaling. Only in case of the daily rain sums a fractal method could have been more accurate. Just as Fourier and
multifractal methods, the current surrogates are not able to model the asymmetric increment distributions
observed for runoff, i.e., they cannot reproduce nonlinear dynamical processes that are asymmetric in time.
Furthermore, we have found differences for the structure functions on small scales.
Surrogate methods are especially valuable for empirical studies, because the time series and fields that are
generated are able to mimic measured variables accurately. Our main application is radiative transfer through
structured clouds. Like many geophysical fields, clouds can only be sampled sparsely, e.g. with in-situ airborne
instruments. However, for radiative transfer calculations we need full 3-dimensional cloud fields. A first study
relating the measured properties of the cloud droplets and the radiative properties of the cloud field by generating
surrogate cloud fields yielded good results within the measurement error.
A further test of the suitability of the surrogate clouds for radiative transfer is evaluated by comparing the radiative
properties of model cloud fields of sparse cumulus and stratocumulus with their surrogate fields. The bias and
root mean square error in various radiative properties is small and the deviations in the radiances and
irradiances are not statistically significant, i.e. these deviations can be attributed to the Monte Carlo noise of the
radiative transfer calculations. We compared these results with optical properties of synthetic clouds that have
either the correct distribution (but no spatial correlations) or the correct power spectrum (but a Gaussian
distribution). These clouds did show statistical significant deviations.
For more information see: http://www.meteo.uni-bonn.de/venema/themes/surrogates/
DE: 0321 Cloud/radiation interaction
DE: 3359 Radiative processes
DE: 4440 Fractals and multifractals
DE: 4499 General or miscellaneous
SC: Union [U]
MN: 2007 Fall Meeting